Appropriateness of action prompts for hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes self-management apps

被引:4
作者
Lum, Elaine [1 ,2 ]
Jimenez, Geronimo [1 ]
Huang, Zhilian [1 ]
Linh Thai [1 ]
Car, Josip [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Sch Clin Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
apps; decision support; diabetes; hyperglycaemia; hypoglycaemia; GLUCOSE;
D O I
10.1002/dmrr.3235
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Control of blood glucose levels is needed not only to alleviate symptoms of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, but also to prevent or delay diabetes-related complications. Advice for glucose control is usually provided to patients by members of the health care team. However, many diabetes apps claim to enhance self-management of blood glucose by providing decision support to patients when an out-of-range blood glucose level is recorded. In this study, we investigated the appropriateness of action prompts provided by diabetes apps for hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia against evidence-based guidelines. Methods We used methods previously reported to identify and select diabetes apps, which were downloaded and assessed against the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines. Screenshots of action prompts corresponding to low or high out-of-range blood glucose values were subjected to content analysis. Results Of 371 diabetes self-management apps evaluated, only 217 and 216 apps alerted patients about hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, respectively. Of these, 20.7% (45/217) and 15.3% (33/216) also provided action prompts. We found 5.1% of apps (hypoglycaemia: 11/217; hyperglycaemia: 11/216) provided prompts that were either too general to be helpful or not aligned with ADA guidelines. Overall, only 17.9% (39/217) and 14.8% (32/216) provided appropriate action prompts for hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, respectively. Conclusion Less than one fifth of apps provided evidence-based steps to guide patients through hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia. The majority of apps failed to provide just-in-time diabetes self-management education to prevent frequent or severe episodes of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia. Our findings emphasize the need for better design and quality assurance of diabetes apps.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2018, 41 :S55-S64
[2]   Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system [J].
Ancker, Jessica S. ;
Edwards, Alison ;
Nosal, Sarah ;
Hauser, Diane ;
Mauer, Elizabeth ;
Kaushal, Rainu .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 17
[3]   The pathobiology of diabetic complications - A unifying mechanism [J].
Brownlee, M .
DIABETES, 2005, 54 (06) :1615-1625
[4]  
Davies MJ, 2018, DIABETOLOGIA, V61, P2461, DOI [10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5, 10.2337/dci18-0033]
[5]   Frequency and predictors of hypoglycaemia in Type 1 and insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes: A population-based study [J].
Donnelly, LA ;
Morris, AD ;
Frier, BM ;
Ellis, JD ;
Donnan, PT ;
Durrant, R ;
Band, MM ;
Reekie, G ;
Leese, GP .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (06) :749-755
[6]  
Gerstein HC, 2008, NEW ENGL J MED, V358, P2545, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743
[7]   Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions [J].
Hertwig, Ralph ;
Grune-Yanoff, Till .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 12 (06) :973-986
[8]   Effect of simulation education and case management on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes [J].
Ji, Hong ;
Chen, Ronghao ;
Huang, Yong ;
Li, Wenqin ;
Shi, Chunhui ;
Zhou, Juan .
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2019, 35 (03)
[9]   Examining Diabetes Management Apps Recommended From a Google Search: Content Analysis [J].
Jimenez, Geronimo ;
Lum, Elaine ;
Car, Josip .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2019, 7 (01)
[10]  
Kalra Sanjay, 2013, Indian J Endocrinol Metab, V17, P819, DOI 10.4103/2230-8210.117219