Studies on digestive physiology and feed digestibilities in captive Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis)

被引:35
作者
Clauss, M
Polster, C
Kienzle, E
Wiesner, H
Baumgartner, K
von Houwald, F
Ortmann, S
Streich, WJ
Dierenfeld, ES
机构
[1] Inst Anim Physiol Physiol Chem & Anim Nutr, Munich, Germany
[2] Zool Garden Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany
[3] Zool Garden Basle, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Inst Zoo & Wildlife Res IZW Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[5] St Louis Zoo, Dept Anim Hlth & Nutr, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00546.x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
We performed intake, digestibility and ingesta passage studies in 11 Indian rhinoceroses (Rhinoceros unicornis) from four zoological institutions, using total faecal collection for the quantification of faecal output. The regularly fed zoo ration of roughage and concentrates (ration RC) and a roughage-only ration (ration R) were used; the roughage source differed between the facilities and comprised grass hay, grass silage, straw and lucerne hay. Dry matter intake ranged between 0.8 and 1.3% of body weight on ration RC and 0.5-1.2% on ration R. Digestibility coefficients achieved were similar to those reported for horses on diets of comparable composition. Endogenous losses as determined by linear regression analysis were within the range reported for horses. Measurements of faecal volatile fatty acids, faecal lactate and faecal pH also showed similarity to similar measurements in horses. The mean retention times of fluids (Co-EDTA) and particles (Cr-mordanted fibre < 2 mm) in the whole gastrointestinal tract averaged 42 and 61 h, respectively, and were the longest ever recorded in a monogastric ungulate with this marker system. The results suggest that the horse is a useful model animal for designing diets for Indian rhinoceroses. Why digestive parameters are similar between these species in spite of enormous differences in body weight and retention times remains to be answered.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 237
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER F, 1963, J COMP PATHOL THERAP, V73, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0368-1742(63)80001-6
[2]   SITES OF ORGANIC-ACID PRODUCTION AND ABSORPTION IN EQUINE GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT [J].
ARGENZIO, RA ;
SOUTHWORTH, M ;
STEVENS, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1974, 226 (05) :1043-1050
[3]  
BEHREND A, 2000, THESIS HUMBOLDT U BE
[4]  
Brahmachary R.L., 1974, Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, V71, P295
[5]  
BRAHMACHARY RL, 1971, J BOMBAY NAT HIST S, V67, P558
[6]  
BREHMS R, 1983, THESIS J LIEBIG U GI
[7]   Studies on feed digestibilities in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) [J].
Clauss, M ;
Loehlein, W ;
Kienzle, E ;
Wiesner, H .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2003, 87 (3-4) :160-173
[8]  
CLAUSS M, 2005, IN PRESS MAMMAL REV
[9]  
CLEMENS ET, 1982, J ZOOL, V198, P141, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1982.tb02066.x
[10]   COMPARISON OF FORAGE DIGESTION BY CATTLE AND HORSES [J].
CYMBALUK, NF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1990, 70 (02) :601-610