How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies

被引:1063
作者
Gu, Jenny [1 ,2 ]
Strauss, Clara [2 ,3 ]
Bond, Rod [1 ]
Cavanagh, Kate [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Psychol, Falmer BN1 9QH, E Sussex, England
[2] Res & Dev Directorate, Sussex Mindfulness Ctr, Hove BN3 7HZ, E Sussex, England
[3] Sussex Partnership NHS Fdn Trust, Hove BN3 7HZ, E Sussex, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Mindfulness; Mechanisms; Mediation; Structural equation modelling; Meta-analysis; Mental health; AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MECHANISMS; COMMITMENT THERAPY; SELF-FOCUS; RUMINATION; INTERVENTION; DEPRESSION; MEDITATION; CANCER; PERSONALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Given the extensive evidence base for the efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), researchers have started to explore the mechanisms underlying their therapeutic effects on psychological outcomes, using methods of mediation analysis. No known studies have systematically reviewed and statistically integrated mediation studies in this field. The present study aimed to systematically review mediation studies in the literature on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), to identify potential psychological mechanisms underlying MBCT and MBSR's effects on psychological functioning and wellbeing, and evaluate the strength and consistency of evidence for each mechanism. For the identified mechanisms with sufficient evidence, quantitative synthesis using two-stage meta-analytic structural equation modelling (TSSEM) was used to examine whether these mechanisms mediate the impact of MBIs on clinical outcomes. This review identified strong, consistent evidence for cognitive and emotional reactivity, moderate and consistent evidence for mindfulness, rumination, and worry, and preliminary but insufficient evidence for self-compassion and psychological flexibility as mechanisms underlying MBIs. TSSEM demonstrated evidence for mindfulness, rumination and worry as significant mediators of the effects of MBIs on mental health outcomes. Most reviewed mediation studies have several key methodological shortcomings which preclude robust conclusions regarding mediation. However, they provide important groundwork on which future studies could build. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MINDFULNESS
[2]  
[Anonymous], METASEM METAANALYSIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, COGNITIVE BEHAV THER
[4]  
[Anonymous], NR87924 U CALG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, MINDFULNESS BASED CO
[7]  
[Anonymous], EUR J PAIN
[8]   Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review [J].
Baer, RA .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2003, 10 (02) :125-143
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]   How Does MBCT for Depression Work? Studying Cognitive and Affective Mediation Pathways [J].
Batink, Tim ;
Peeters, Frenk ;
Geschwind, Nicole ;
van Os, Jim ;
Wichers, Marieke .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08)