Rigorous analysis of Pareto fronts in sustainability studies based on bilevel optimization: Application to the redesign of the UK electricity mix

被引:23
作者
Limleamthong, Phantisa [1 ]
Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Ctr Proc Syst Engn, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Dept Engn Quim, Av Paisos,Catalans 26, E-43007 Tarragona, Spain
关键词
Multi-objective optimization; Bilevel optimization; Sustainable development; Sustainability targets; Electricity generation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; SUPPLY CHAINS; OPTIMAL-DESIGN; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES; DECISION-MAKING; LOWER LEVEL; PROGRAMS; ALGORITHMS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.134
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Multi-objective optimization (MOO) is at present widely used in the design and planning of sustainable systems where economic, environmental and social aspects must be considered simultaneously. The solution of a multi-objective model is given by a set of Pareto optimal points that feature the property that they cannot be improved in one objective without necessarily worsening at least another one. Identifying the best Pareto solution from this set is challenging, particularly when many objectives and decision-makers are involved in the analysis. In this work, we propose the first rigorous method (to the authors' knowledge) based on bilevel optimization to explore Pareto points that allows to: (i) identify in a systematic manner non-dominated solutions which are particularly appealing for decision-makers; (ii) quantify the distance between any (suboptimal) feasible point of a MOO model and its Pareto front (i.e. project suboptimal points onto the Pareto frontier); and (iii) establish improvement targets for suboptimal solutions of a MOO (through projection onto the Pareto front) that if attained would make them optimal. Overall, our method allows analysing Pareto fronts and selecting a final Pareto point to be implemented in practice without the need to define subjective weights in an explicit manner. We illustrate the capabilities of our approach through its application to the optimization of the UK electricity mix according to several economic, environmental and social indicators. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1602 / 1613
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   An exact penalty on bilevel programs with linear vector optimization lower level [J].
Ankhili, Z. ;
Mansouri, A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 197 (01) :36-41
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Practical bi-level optimization
[3]   A BRANCH AND BOUND ALGORITHM FOR THE BILEVEL PROGRAMMING PROBLEM [J].
BARD, JF ;
MOORE, JT .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC AND STATISTICAL COMPUTING, 1990, 11 (02) :281-292
[4]  
Bhaskar V, 2000, REV CHEM ENG, V16, P1
[5]  
Biegler L.T., 2004, COMPUT CHEM ENG
[6]   MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMS WITH OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS IN CONSTRAINTS [J].
BRACKEN, J ;
MCGILL, JT .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1973, 21 (01) :37-44
[7]   On linear bilevel problems with multiple objectives at the lower level [J].
Calvete, Herminia I. ;
Gale, Carmen .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (01) :33-40
[8]   Linear bilevel programs with multiple objectives at the upper level [J].
Calvete, Herminia I. ;
Gale, Carmen .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2010, 234 (04) :950-959
[9]  
Candler W, 1977, Technical Report 20
[10]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444