Double versus single intrauterine insemination for unexplained infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

被引:20
|
作者
Polyzos, Nikolaos P. [1 ]
Tzioras, Spyridon [1 ]
Mauri, Davide [1 ]
Tatsioni, Athina [2 ]
机构
[1] Panhellen Assoc Continual Med Res, Sect Obstet & Gynaecol & Publ Hlth, Athens, Greece
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
Intrauterine insemination; IUI; double IUI; unexplained infertility; meta-analysis; CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; PREGNANCY RATES; SUBFERTILITY; EFFICACY; HUSBANDS; PITFALLS; CYCLES; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.052
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the effect of double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) per treatment cycle in women with unexplained infertility. Design: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical pregnancy rates per couple. Intervention(s): Electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Trials Registry and Medline without year and language restriction through March 2009; hand searching of the abstract books of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine annual meetings (2001-2008). Result(s): Six randomized trials, involving 829 women, were included in the analysis. Fifty-four (13.6%) clinical pregnancies were recorded for treatment with double IUI and 62 (14.4%) for treatment with single IUI. There was no significant difference between the single and double IUI groups in the probability for clinical pregnancy (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.45; P=0.715). Conclusion(s): Double IUI offers no clear benefit in the overall clinical pregnancy rate in couples with unexplained infertility. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010;94:1261-6. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1266
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of single versus double intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility
    Rahman, Syed Monajatur
    Malhotra, Neena
    Kumar, Sunesh
    Roy, Kallol Kumar
    Agarwal, Ashok
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (07) : 2913 - 2915
  • [2] Double versus single homologous intrauterine insemination for male factor infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zavos, Apostolos
    Daponte, Alexandros
    Garas, Antonios
    Verykouki, Christina
    Papanikolaou, Evangelos
    Anifandis, Georgios
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2013, 15 (04) : 533 - 538
  • [3] Ovarian stimulation strategies for intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained infertility: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
    Wessel, J. A.
    Danhof, N. A.
    van Eekelen, R.
    Diamond, M. P.
    Legro, R. S.
    Peeraer, K.
    D'Hooghe, T. M.
    Erdem, M.
    Dankert, T.
    Cohlen, B. J.
    Thyagaraju, C.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Showell, M.
    van Wely, M.
    Mochtar, M. H.
    Wang, R.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2022, 28 (05) : 733 - 746
  • [4] Intrauterine insemination plus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus in vitro fertilisation in unexplained infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nandi, Anupa
    Raja, Gangopadhyay
    White, Davinia
    Tarek, El-Toukhy
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 305 (04) : 805 - 824
  • [5] Recombinant FSH versus clomiphene citrate for ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained infertility and male subfertility undergoing intrauterine insemination: a randomized trial
    Berker, Bulent
    Kahraman, Korhan
    Taskin, Salih
    Sukur, Yavuz Emre
    Sonmezer, Murat
    Atabekoglu, Cem Somer
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 284 (06) : 1561 - 1566
  • [6] Intrauterine insemination + controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus in vitro fertilisation in unexplained infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Anupa Nandi
    Gangopadhyay Raja
    Davinia White
    El-Toukhy Tarek
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 305 : 805 - 824
  • [7] Ultrasound guidance versus classical method for intrauterine insemination: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Baradwan, Saeed
    Alshahrani, Majed Saeed
    Miski, Najlaa Talat
    Alkhamis, Waleed H.
    Alfaifi, Suhail S.
    Abdelhakim, Ahmed Mohamed
    Sunoqrot, Mohammad
    Ahmaro, Manar
    Abdelazem, Osama
    Mohammed, Ahmed Hashim
    Abbas, Ahmed M.
    Bakry, Mohamed Sobhy
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 263 : 223 - 230
  • [8] Single versus Double Intrauterine Insemination in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Cycles: A Randomized Trial
    Sorouri, Ziba Zahiri
    Shomali, Romina Rashid
    Pourmarzi, Davoud
    ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2016, 19 (07) : 465 - 469
  • [9] Comparision of Letrozole with Timed Intercourse Versus Clomiphene Citrate with Intrauterine Insemination in Patients with Unexplained Infertility
    Rodriguez-Purata, Jorge
    Lee, Joseph
    Whitehouse, Michael
    Sandler, Benjamin
    Copperman, Alan
    Mukherjee, Tanmoy
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 61 (9-10) : 425 - 430
  • [10] Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) for pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arab-Zozani, Morteza
    Nastri, Carolina O.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 215 : 75 - 84