Apical Node Involvement Does Not Influence Prognosis After Potentially Curative Resection for Stage III Colorectal Cancer A Competing Risks Analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Ng, Kheng-Seong [1 ]
Dent, Owen F. [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Charles [3 ]
Newland, Ronald C. [4 ]
Keshava, Anil [1 ,2 ]
Stewart, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Rickard, Matthew J. F. X. [1 ,2 ]
Chapuis, Pierre H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Colorectal Surg Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Discipline Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Div Anat Pathol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Discipline Pathol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
apical node; cancer-specific death; colorectal cancer; competing risks; recurrence; SIGMOID COLON; SURVIVAL; METASTASIS; CLASSIFICATION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000004353
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To examine the independent prognostic value of ALN status in patients with stage III CRC. Summary of Background Data: Early CRC staging classified nodal involvement by level of involved nodes in the operative specimen, including both locoregional and apical node status, in contrast to the American Joint Committee on Cancer/tumor nodes metastasis (TNM) system where tumors are classified by the number of nodes involved. Whether ALN status has independent prognostic value remains controversial. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for Stage III CRC from 1995 to 2012 at Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia were studied. ALN status was classified as: (i) ALN absent, (ii) ALN present but not histologically involved, (iii) ALN present and involved. Outcomes were the competing risks incidence of CRC recurrence and CRC-specific death. Associations between these outcomes and ALN status were compared with TNM N status results. Results: In 706 patients, 69 (9.8%) had an involved ALN, 398 (56.4%) had an uninvolved ALN and 239 (33.9%) had no ALN identified. ALN status was not associated with tumor recurrence [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.26] or CRC-specific death (HR 1.14, CI 0.91-1.43). However, associations persisted between TNM N-status and both recurrence (HR 1.58, CI 1.21-2.06) and CRC-specific death (HR 1.59, CI 1.19-2.12). Conclusions: No further prognostic information was conferred by ALN status in patients with stage III CRC beyond that provided by TNM N status. ALN status is not considered to be a useful additional component in routine TNM staging of CRC.
引用
收藏
页码:E24 / E31
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comment on "Apical Node Involvement Does Not Influence Prognosis After Potentially Curative Resection for Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Competing Risks Analysis''
    Zhang, Qian
    Chen, Bin
    Liu, Zhong-Kai
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (06) : E889 - E890
  • [2] The Clinical Impact of Apical Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer After Curative Resection
    Hiraki, Masatsugu
    Tanaka, Toshiya
    Sadashima, Eiji
    Sato, Hirofumi
    Kitahara, Kenji
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2023, 54 (02) : 506 - 512
  • [3] Tumor Budding and Survival After Potentially Curative Resection of Node-Positive Colon Cancer
    Sy, Joanne
    Fung, Caroline L. -S.
    Dent, Owen F.
    Chapuis, Pierre H.
    Bokey, Les
    Chan, Charles
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (03) : 301 - 307
  • [4] The Clinical Impact of Apical Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer After Curative Resection
    Masatsugu Hiraki
    Toshiya Tanaka
    Eiji Sadashima
    Hirofumi Sato
    Kenji Kitahara
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2023, 54 : 506 - 512
  • [5] Competing risks analysis of the effect of local residual tumour on recurrence and cancer-specific death after resection of colorectal cancer: implications for staging
    Newland, Ronald C.
    Chan, Charles
    Chapuis, Pierre H.
    Keshava, Anil
    Rickard, Matthew J. F. X.
    Young, Christopher J.
    Dent, Owen F.
    PATHOLOGY, 2018, 50 (06) : 600 - 606
  • [6] Post-pulmonary metastasectomy prognosis after curative resection for colorectal cancer
    Kim, Jee Yeon
    Park, In Ja
    Kim, Hyeong Ryul
    Kim, Dong Kwan
    Lee, Jong Lyul
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Lee, Jung Bok
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (22) : 36566 - 36577
  • [7] A competing risk analysis of colorectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery
    Schellenberg, Angela E.
    Moravan, Veronika
    Christian, Francis
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] The use of adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with recurrence or cancer-specific death following curative resection for stage III rectal cancer: a competing risks analysis
    Ng, Kheng-Seong
    Chan, Charles
    Rickard, Matthew John Francis Xavier
    Keshava, Anil
    Stewart, Peter
    Chapuis, Pierre Henri
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [9] Predictive Nomogram for Recurrence of Stage I Colorectal Cancer After Curative Resection
    Kim, Chan
    Kim, Woo Ram
    Kim, Ki-Yeol
    Chon, Hong Jae
    Beom, Seung Hoon
    Kim, Hyojoong
    Jung, Minkyu
    Shin, Sang Joon
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    Ahn, Joong Bae
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2018, 17 (03) : E513 - E518
  • [10] Impact of RAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Potentially Curative Resection: Does Site of Metastases Matter?
    Passot, Guillaume
    Kim, Bradford J.
    Glehen, Olivier
    Mehran, Reza J.
    Kopetz, Scott E.
    Goere, Diane
    Overman, Michael J.
    Pocard, Marc
    Marchal, Frederic
    Conrad, Claudius
    Aloia, Thomas A.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Chun, Yun Shin
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (01) : 179 - 187