A comparative study of three biomaterials in an ovine bone defect model

被引:21
作者
Cheng, Boyle C. [1 ]
Jaffee, Stephen [1 ]
Averick, Saadyah [1 ]
Swink, Isaac [1 ]
Horvath, Steve [2 ]
Zhukauskas, Rasa [2 ]
机构
[1] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Allegheny Singer Res Inst, Dept Neurosurg, 420 East North Ave,Suite 302, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[2] RTI Surg, Alachua, FL USA
关键词
3D printed; Interbody fusion; Osseointegration; PEEK; PEKK; Spine; Ti-coated PEEK; INTERBODY FUSION CAGES; TITANIUM; PEEK; POLYETHERETHERKETONE; IMPACTION; INGROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2019.10.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and more recently titanium-coated PEEK, have been given serious consideration as biomaterial design choices for spinal interbody implants. Shortcomings in these materials necessitate further innovation into materials research, for example, on PEKK. Common complications such as surface delamination (as with titanium coating) and lack of bone apposition (as with PEEK) indicate the need for a new material that inherently displays preferable bone growth characteristics without sacrificing structural integrity. PURPOSE: To compare three biomaterials with respect to their osseointegrative capacity. STUDY DESIGN: Evaluate the in vivo material characteristics of three separate biomaterials in an ovine bone defect model: PEEK, titanium-coated PEEK (Ti-coated PEEK), and 3D-printed PEKK. Biomechanical, histologic, and radiographic testing was the basis for evaluation and material characterization. METHODS: Eight ovine specimens were implanted with one of each of the three types of biomaterials tested in both left and right epicondyles using a femoral bone defect model, and were sacrificed at 8 and 16 weeks. Implants were then analyzed using a push-out method, histologic staining, and various radiographic tests. Industry funding was provided for the completion of this research study, followed by an independent third party review of all relevant data for publication. RESULTS: PEKK implants demonstrated bone ingrowth, no radiographic interference, no fibrotic tissue membrane formation, significant increase in bony apposition over time, and significantly higher push-out strength compared to standard PEEK. The PEKK implant displayed bone growth characteristics comparable to Ti-coated PEEK with significant improvements in implant integrity and radiographic properties. CONCLUSION: This study found that PEKK displayed preferable characteristics when compared to PEEK and Ti-coated PEEK, and is therefore a potential alternative to their use. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 464
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2000, GUIDANCE IND TESTING, P1
  • [2] [Anonymous], BIOMECHANICAL INVEST
  • [3] CRYSTALLIZATION IN PEKK AND PEEK RESINS - COMMENT
    AVAKIAN, P
    GARDNER, KH
    MATHESON, RR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART C-POLYMER LETTERS, 1990, 28 (08) : 243 - 246
  • [4] Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages
    Cabraja, Mario
    Oezdemir, Soner
    Koeppen, Daniel
    Kroppenstedt, Stefan
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2012, 13
  • [5] Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK
    Carpenter, R. Dana
    Klosterhoff, Brett S.
    Torstrick, F. Brennan
    Foley, Kevin T.
    Burkus, J. Kenneth
    Lee, Christopher S. D.
    Gall, Ken
    Guldberg, Robert E.
    Safranski, David L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2018, 80 : 68 - 76
  • [6] Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up
    Chen, Yu
    Wang, Xinwei
    Lu, Xuhua
    Yang, Lili
    Yang, Haisong
    Yuan, Wen
    Chen, Deyu
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (07) : 1539 - 1546
  • [7] Porous titanium-coated polyetheretherketone implants exhibit an improved bone-implant interface: an in vitro and in vivo biochemical, biomechanical, and histological study
    Cheng, Boyle C.
    Koduri, Sravanthi
    Wing, Charles A.
    Woolery, Natalie
    Cook, Daniel J.
    Spiro, Robert C.
    [J]. MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2018, 11 : 391 - 402
  • [8] Stand-alone cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of high-degree degenerative disc disease: design of a new device for an "old" technique. A prospective study on a series of 116 patients
    Costa, Francesco
    Sassi, Marco
    Ortolina, Alessandro
    Cardia, Andrea
    Assietti, Roberto
    Zerbi, Alberto
    Lorenzetti, Martin
    Galbusera, Fabio
    Fornari, Maurizio
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 : 46 - 56
  • [9] Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium threaded cage device
    Elias, WJ
    Simmons, NE
    Kaptain, GJ
    Chadduck, JB
    Whitehill, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 93 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [10] Effects of Surface Charges on Dental Implants: Past, Present, and Future
    Guo, Cecilia Yan
    Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka
    Tang, Alexander Tin Hong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS, 2012, 2012