Investigating the equivalent performance of biparametric compared to multiparametric MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:16
|
作者
Wang, Baojun [1 ]
Gao, Jie [1 ]
Zhang, Qing [1 ]
Zhang, Chengwei [1 ]
Liu, Guangxiang [1 ]
Wei, Wang [1 ]
Huang, Haifeng [1 ]
Fu, Yao [2 ]
Li, Danyan [3 ]
Zhang, Bing [3 ]
Guo, Hongqian [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Dept Urol, Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp, Affiliated Hosp,Med Sch,Inst Urol, 321 Zhongshan Rd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Dept Pathol, Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp, Affiliated Hosp,Med Sch, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Dept Radiol, Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp, Affiliated Hosp,Med Sch, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Clinically significant prostate cancer; Biparametric MRI; Dynamic contrast enhanced; MRI/ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy; Mean value of apparent diffusion coefficient; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; IMAGING-TARGETED BIOPSY; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY; ADC VALUES; DIAGNOSIS; PREDICTION; GUIDELINES; DENSITY; GRADE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-019-02281-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose PIRADS v2 stipulates that dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging be used to categorize diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI) score 3 (DWI 3) peripheral zone (PZ) lesions as PIRADS score 3 (PIRADS 3; DCE -) or PIRADS 4 (DCE +). It's controversial for the value of DCE in improving clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection. We aimed to figure out whether DCE improves csPCa detection and explore new available measures to improve csPCa detection. Patients and methods We retrospectively enrolled 375 patients who underwent mp MRI before MRI/ultrasound (US) fusion-targeted biopsy ( TB) with transperineal systematic biopsy (SB). All lesions were classified as DWI 3/DCE -, DWI 3/DCE +, DWI 4/PIRADS 4 lesions. Detection rates of csPCa for each lesion group were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of each approach was analyzed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis. Results Totally, 109 DWI 3 or DWI 4 single lesions in PZ were analyzed (n = 109). The rates of csPCa detection for Group A, Group B, Group C is 10.3%, 13.9%, 55.9%, respectively (A vs. B, p = 0.625; B vs. C, p < 0.001). ROC analysis and decision curve analysis showed the method of combining Age, PSA Density (PSAD) and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient value ( ADC(mean)) outperforms individual approaches for csPCa detection. Conclusion For DWI 3 lesions in PZ, DCE sequence has not additional value for improving detection of csPCa. The integration of clinical characteristics and bpMRI parameter improves the detection of csPCa.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 555
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigating the equivalent performance of biparametric compared to multiparametric MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Baojun Wang
    Jie Gao
    Qing Zhang
    Chengwei Zhang
    Guangxiang Liu
    Wang Wei
    Haifeng Huang
    Yao Fu
    Danyan Li
    Bing Zhang
    Hongqian Guo
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 547 - 555
  • [2] BIPARAMETRIC MRI PERFORMANCE IS COMPARABLE TO MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI FOR THE ACCURATE DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Pickersgill, Nicholas A.
    Shiang, Alex L.
    Vetter, Joel M.
    Barashi, Nimrod
    Sheng, John
    Ippolito, Joseph E.
    Kim, Eric H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E307 - E307
  • [3] Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Rachael L. Sherrer
    Zachary A. Glaser
    Jennifer B. Gordetsky
    Jeffrey W. Nix
    Kristin K. Porter
    Soroush Rais-Bahrami
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2019, 22 : 331 - 336
  • [4] Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Sherrer, Rachael L.
    Glaser, Zachary A.
    Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Porter, Kristin K.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2019, 22 (02) : 331 - 336
  • [5] Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in a diverse, multiethnic population
    Abramson, Max
    DeMasi, Matthew
    Zhu, Denzel
    Hines, Laena
    Lin, Wilson
    Kanmaniraja, Devaraju
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Agalliu, Ilir
    Watts, Kara L.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (07) : 2491 - 2498
  • [6] Multiparametric Versus Biparametric Prostate MRI: Comparison of NPV for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Birosh, Adam
    Salinas-Miranda, Emmanuel
    Breau, Rodney H.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Morash, Christopher
    Schieda, Nicola
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 222 (03)
  • [7] Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 18 (04) : 597 - 606
  • [8] Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI, Biparametric MRI, and Clinical Parameters
    Oberneder, Maximilian
    Henzler, Thomas
    Kriegmair, Martin
    Vag, Tibor
    Roethke, Matthias
    Siegert, Sabine
    Lang, Roland
    Lenk, Julia
    Gawlitza, Joshua
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2024,
  • [9] Values of multiparametric and biparametric MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis
    Xiao Feng
    Xin Chen
    Peng Peng
    He Zhou
    Yi Hong
    Chunxia Zhu
    Libing Lu
    Siyu Xie
    Sijun Zhang
    Liling Long
    BMC Urology, 24
  • [10] Values of multiparametric and biparametric MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis
    Feng, Xiao
    Chen, Xin
    Peng, Peng
    Zhou, He
    Hong, Yi
    Zhu, Chunxia
    Lu, Libing
    Xie, Siyu
    Zhang, Sijun
    Long, Liling
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)