Advanced Beam Formulations for Free-Vibration Analysis of Conventional and Joined Wings

被引:54
作者
Carrera, Erasmo [1 ]
Petrolo, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Varello, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, I-10129 Turin, Italy
[2] CNRS, UMR7190, Inst Jean Le Rond dAlembert, F-75252 Paris, France
关键词
Beams; Finite element method; Higher-order theories; Vibration; Thin-walled structures; Aerospace engineering; DYNAMIC STIFFNESS MATRIX; SHEAR DEFORMATION; FINITE-ELEMENT; TRANSVERSE VIBRATIONS; COMPOSITE; PLATES;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000130
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This work extends advanced beam models to carry out a more accurate free-vibration analysis of conventional (straight, or with sweep/dihedral angles) and joined wings. The beam models are obtained by assuming higher-order (up to fourth) expansions for the unknown displacement variables over the cross-section. Higher-order terms permit bending/torsion modes to be coupled and capture any other vibration modes that require in-plane and warping deformation of the beam sections to be detected. Classical beam analyses, based on the Euler-Bernoulli and on Timoshenko beam theories, are obtained as particular cases. Numerical solutions are obtained by using the finite element (FE) method, which permits various boundary conditions and different wing/section geometries to be handled with ease. A comparison with other shell/solid FE solutions is given to examine the beam model. The capability of the beam model to detect bending, torsion, mixed and other vibration modes is shown by considering conventional and joined wings with different beam axis geometries as well as with various sections (compact, plate-type, thin-walled airfoil-type). The accuracy and the limitations of classical beam theories have been highlighted for a number of problems. It has been concluded that the proposed beam model could lead to quasi-three-dimensional dynamic responses of classical and nonclassical beam geometries. It provides better results than classical beam approaches, and it is much more computationally efficient than shell/solid modeling approaches. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000130. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 293
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CURVIS ELASTICIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1970, Theory of elasticity (3rd Edition)
[3]   Dynamic stiffness formulation and free vibration analysis of a three-layered sandwich beam [J].
Banerjee, JR ;
Sobey, AJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2005, 42 (08) :2181-2197
[4]   Exact dynamic stiffness matrix of a bending-torsion coupled beam including warping [J].
Banerjee, JR ;
Guo, S ;
Howson, WP .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1996, 59 (04) :613-621
[5]   COUPLED BENDING-TORSIONAL DYNAMIC STIFFNESS MATRIX FOR TIMOSHENKO BEAM ELEMENTS [J].
BANERJEE, JR ;
WILLIAMS, FW .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1992, 42 (03) :301-310
[6]   CLAMPED CLAMPED NATURAL FREQUENCIES OF A BENDING TORSION COUPLED BEAM [J].
BANERJEE, JR ;
WILLIAMS, FW .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1994, 176 (03) :301-306
[7]   Free vibration of axially loaded composite Timoshenko beams using the dynamic stiffness matrix method [J].
Banerjee, JR .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1998, 69 (02) :197-208
[8]  
Bathe K.-J., 2006, FINITE ELEMENT PROCE
[9]   ON COUPLED BENDING AND TORSIONAL VIBRATION OF UNIFORM BEAMS [J].
BISHOP, RED ;
CANNON, SM ;
MIAO, S .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1989, 131 (03) :457-464
[10]   Theories and finite elements for multilayered plates and shells: A unified compact formulation with numerical assessment and benchmarking [J].
Carrera, E .
ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2003, 10 (03) :215-296