Balancing stakeholder priorities in the operation of combined heat and power systems

被引:20
作者
Fabian Fuentes-Cortes, Luis [1 ]
Maria Ponce-Ortega, Jose [2 ]
Zavala, Victor M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tecnol Monterrey, Escuela Ingn & Ciencias, Ave Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, NL, Mexico
[2] Univ Michoacana, Dept Chem Engn, Morelia 58060, Michoacan, Mexico
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, 1415 Engn Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CHP systems; Multi-stakeholder; Decision-making; Demand patterns; MICRO-CHP SYSTEMS; COGENERATION SYSTEMS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; HOUSING COMPLEXES; RENEWABLE ENERGY; DECISION-MAKING; OPTIMAL-DESIGN; HOT-WATER; ELECTRICITY; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.09.052
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This work explores the impact of re-adjusting demand patterns (electricity and hot water) of building occupants on the economic and environmental performance of combined heat and power (CHP) systems. Trade-off analysis reveals that adjustments in demand patterns provide significant flexibility to synchronize electricity and hot water demands and with this it is possible to minimize water usage, emissions, and cost. As expected, however, such benefits come at expense of significant occupant dissatisfaction. To address this issue, we use a multi-stakeholder optimization framework that takes occupant priorities into account and computes a compromise solution that minimizes the collective stakeholder dissatisfaction. By using this framework, we find that there exist non-obvious CHP operating policies that achieve nearly perfect tracking of nominal occupant demands while significantly improving economic and environmental performance. The proposed framework can be used to inform occupants on the impact of their priorities on CHP performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 488
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   Occupant centered lighting control: A user study on balancing comfort, acceptance, and energy consumption [J].
Nagy, Zoltan ;
Yong, Fah Yik ;
Schlueter, Arno .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 126 :310-322
[42]   Application of energy system models for designing a low-carbon society [J].
Nakata, Toshihiko ;
Silva, Diego ;
Rodionov, Mikhail .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2011, 37 (04) :462-502
[43]   Households as change agents in a Dutch smart energy transition: On power, privacy and participation [J].
Naus, Joeri ;
van Vliet, Bas J. M. ;
Hendriksen, Astrid .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 9 :125-136
[44]   Modeling of internal combustion engine based cogeneration systems for residential applications [J].
Onovwiona, Hycienth I. ;
Ugursal, V. Ismet ;
Fung, Alan S. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 27 (5-6) :848-861
[45]   How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy [J].
Owens, Susan ;
Driffill, Louise .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (12) :4412-4418
[46]   Environmental impacts of distributed energy systems - The case of micro cogeneration [J].
Pehnt, Martin .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2008, 11 (01) :25-37
[47]   Sequential optimization of a polygeneration plant [J].
Rubio-Maya, Carlos ;
Uche, Javier ;
Martinez, Amaya .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (8-9) :2861-2869
[48]   Short-term operation planning on cogeneration systems: A survey [J].
Salgado, Fabricio ;
Pedrero, Pedro .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2008, 78 (05) :835-848
[49]   A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems [J].
Scott, James A. ;
Ho, William ;
Dey, Prasanta K. .
ENERGY, 2012, 42 (01) :146-156
[50]  
SENER, 2015, PROSP SECT EL 2015 2