Patient knowledge of coronary risk profile improves the effectiveness of dyslipidemia therapy - The CHECK-UP study: A Randomized controlled trial

被引:133
作者
Grover, Steven A.
Lowensteyn, Ilka
Joseph, Lawrence
Kaouache, Mohammed
Marchand, Sylvie
Coupal, Louis
Boudreau, Ghislain
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Clin Epidemiol,McGill Card, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Biostat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Pfizer Canada, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.167.21.2296
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite increasing evidence that treating dyslipidemia reduces cardiovascular events, many patients do not achieve recommended lipid targets. Methods: To determine whether showing physicians and patients the patient's calculated coronary risk can improve the effectiveness of treating dyslipidemia in a primary care setting, patients were randomized to receive usual care or ongoing feedback regarding their calculated coronary risk and the change in this risk after lifestyle changes, pharmacotherapy, or both to treat dyslipidemia. Outcomes, based on intention-to-treat analysis, included changes in blood lipid levels, coronary risk, and the frequency of reaching lipid targets. Results: Two hundred thirty primary care physicians enrolled 3053 patients. After 12 months of follow-up, 2687 patients (88.0%) remained in the study. After adjustment for baseline lipid values, significantly greater mean reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and the total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio were observed in patients receiving risk profiles (51.2 mg/dL [to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259] and 1.5, respectively) vs usual care (48.0 mg/dL and 1.3, respectively), but the differences were small (-3.3 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.4 to -1.1 mg/dL; and -0.1; 95% CI, -0.2 to -0.1, respectively). Patients in the risk profile group were also more likely to reach lipid targets (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.48). A significant dose-response effect was also noted when the impact of the risk profile was stronger in those with worse profiles. Conclusions: Discussing coronary risk with the patient is associated with a small but measurable improvement in the efficacy of lipid therapy. The value of incorporating risk assessment in preventive care should be further evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:2296 / 2303
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] DISCONTINUATION OF ANTIHYPERLIPIDEMIC DRUGS - DO RATES REPORTED IN CLINICAL-TRIALS REFLECT RATES IN PRIMARY-CARE SETTINGS
    ANDRADE, SE
    WALKER, AM
    GOTTLIEB, LK
    HOLLENBERG, NK
    TESTA, MA
    SAPERIA, GM
    PLATT, R
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (17) : 1125 - 1131
  • [2] Persistence of use of lipid-lowering medications - A cross-national study
    Avorn, J
    Monette, J
    Lacour, A
    Bohn, RL
    Monane, M
    Mogun, H
    LeLorier, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (18): : 1458 - 1462
  • [3] Involving patients in medical decisions - How can physicians do better?
    Barry, MJ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24): : 2356 - 2357
  • [4] Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patients
    Benner, JS
    Glynn, RJ
    Mogun, H
    Neumann, PJ
    Weinstein, MC
    Avorn, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (04): : 455 - 461
  • [5] Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care
    Bodenheimer, T
    Lorig, K
    Holman, H
    Grumbach, K
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (19): : 2469 - 2475
  • [6] Informed decision making in outpatient practice - Time to get back to basics
    Braddock, CH
    Edwards, KA
    Hasenberg, NM
    Laidley, TL
    Levinson, W
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24): : 2313 - 2320
  • [7] Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
    Cleeman, JI
    Grundy, SM
    Becker, D
    Clark, LT
    Cooper, RS
    Denke, MA
    Howard, WJ
    Hunninghake, DB
    Illingworth, DR
    Luepker, RV
    McBride, P
    McKenney, JM
    Pasternak, RC
    Stone, NJ
    Van Horn, L
    Brewer, HB
    Ernst, ND
    Gordon, D
    Levy, D
    Rifkind, B
    Rossouw, JE
    Savage, P
    Haffner, SM
    Orloff, DG
    Proschan, MA
    Schwartz, JS
    Sempos, CT
    Shero, ST
    Murray, EZ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19): : 2486 - 2497
  • [8] Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial
    Colhoun, HM
    Betteridge, DJ
    Durrington, PN
    Hitman, GA
    Neil, HAW
    Livingstone, SJ
    Thomason, MJ
    Mackness, MI
    Charlton-Menys, V
    Fuller, JH
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9435) : 685 - 696
  • [9] Collins R, 2002, LANCET, V360, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3
  • [10] European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice -: Third Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice
    De Backer, G
    Ambrosioni, E
    Borch-Johnsen, K
    Brotons, C
    Cifkova, R
    Dallongeville, J
    Ebrahim, S
    Faergeman, O
    Graham, I
    Mancia, G
    Cats, VM
    Orth-Gomér, K
    Perk, J
    Pyörälä, K
    Rodicio, JL
    Sans, S
    Sansoy, V
    Sechtem, U
    Silber, S
    Thomsen, T
    Wood, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (17) : 1601 - 1610