Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer-ROI-C-Fixation and Combined Intervertebral Cage and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center

被引:17
作者
He, Shuangjun [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Zhangzhe [2 ]
Lv, Nanning [3 ]
Shao, Xiaofeng [2 ]
Zhou, Xinfeng [2 ]
Wang, Yaowei [1 ]
Wu, Shuhua [1 ]
Chen, Kangwu [2 ]
Zhou, Lijian [1 ]
Qian, Zhonglai [2 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Peoples Hosp Danyang, Affiliated Danyang Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Danyang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthoped Surg, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Second Peoples Hosp Lianyungang, Dept Orthoped Surg, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2021年 / 27卷
关键词
Cervical Vertebrae; Neck Pain; Spondylosis; RISK-FACTORS; REDUCES RATE; PLATE; DYSPHAGIA; RELIABILITY; SUBSIDENCE; DEVICE; SPINE; ACDF;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.931050
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile anchored spacer-ROI-C-fixation (ROI-C) vs combined intervertebral cage and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Material/Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 87 patients who underwent operations between January 2015 and January 2019, including 42 patients that underwent ROI-C treatment (group A) and 45 that were treated by the ACDF approach (group B). Operative duration, blood loss, dysphagia, Neck Disability Index scores (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (JOA), and other complications were compared between these groups. In addition, implant settlement, fusion, and cervical Cobb angle were assessed via imaging analyses. Results: Patients in group A and group B were followed for 22.6 +/- 3.3 months and 27.1 +/- 3.5 months, respectively (range: 13-30 months). Relative to preoperative values, JOA scores were increased and NDI scores were reduced in both groups following treatment (P<0.05), with comparable outcomes between groups (P>0.05). However, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications did differ significantly between these groups (P<0.05). Specifically, rates of short-term dysphagia were lower and recovery time was faster in group A relative to group B (P<0.05). Conclusions: The findings from this study showed that ROI-C fixation achieved satisfactory outcomes, improved cervical curvature, restored intervertebral height, and was associated with shorter operative duration, reduced blood loss, and less dysphagia.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): Comparison Between Zero Profile Implants and Anterior Cervical Plate and Spacer [J].
Alimi, Marjan ;
Njoku, Innocent ;
Hofstetter, Christoph P. ;
Tsiouris, Apostolos J. ;
Kesavabhotla, Kartik ;
Boockvar, John ;
Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo ;
Hartl, Roger .
CUREUS, 2016, 8 (04)
[2]   Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery - A prospective study [J].
Bazaz, R ;
Lee, MJ ;
Yoo, JU .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (22) :2453-2458
[3]   Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J].
Boogaarts, Hieronymus D. ;
Bartels, Ronald H. M. A. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 :S139-S141
[4]  
Bucci MN, 2017, MED DEVICES-EVID RES, V10, P61, DOI 10.2147/MDER.S127133
[5]   Cervical Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage versus Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion : Minimum 2-Year Assessment of Radiographic and Clinical Outcome [J].
Cho, Hyun-Jun ;
Hur, Junseok W. ;
Lee, Jang-Bo ;
Han, Jin-Sol ;
Cho, Tai-Hyoung ;
Park, Jung-Yul .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 58 (02) :119-124
[6]   Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with the zero-prbfile device versus plate and cage in treating cervical degenerative disc disease: A meta-analysis [J].
Duan, Yuchen ;
Yang, Yunbei ;
Wang, Yayi ;
Liu, Hao ;
Hong, Ying ;
Gong, Quan ;
Song, Yueming .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 33 :11-18
[7]  
Epstein Nancy E, 2015, Surg Neurol Int, V6, pS140, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.156552
[8]   Stand-alone interbody cage versus anterior cervical plate for treatment of cervical disc herniation: Sequential changes in cage subsidence [J].
Fujibayashi, Shunsuke ;
Neo, Masashi ;
Nakamura, Takashi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 15 (09) :1017-1022
[9]   Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning [J].
Gercek, E ;
Arlet, V ;
Delisle, J ;
Marchesi, D .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (05) :513-516
[10]  
Guo X, 2014, J SPINAL DISORD TECH, V27, pE241, DOI 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000098