A review of experimental and analytical studies on the out-of-plane behaviour of masonry infilled frames

被引:53
作者
Anic, Filip [1 ]
Penava, Davorin [1 ]
Abrahamczyk, Lars [2 ]
Sarhosis, Vasilis [3 ]
机构
[1] Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek, Fac Civil Engn & Architecture Osijek, 3 Vladimir Prelog Str, Osijek 31000, Croatia
[2] Bauhaus Univ Weimar, Erdbebenzentrum, Marienstr 13B, D-99423 Weimar, Germany
[3] Univ Leeds, Fac Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Out-of-plane behaviour; Experimental studies; Analytical studies; Masonry infilled frames; Experimental methodologies; SEISMIC BEHAVIOR; WALLS; RESISTANCE; INPLANE; PANELS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-019-00771-5
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents a literature review of research undertaken on the out-of-plane behaviour of masonry infilled frames. This paper also discusses the effects of bidirectional loads, openings, slenderness, boundary conditions etc. As numerous researchers have reported, these effects play a crucial role in achieving arching action cause, as they can bypass or limit its effectiveness. Namely, arching action leads to additional compressive forces which resist traversal ones. This is confirmed by inertial force methods of testing, while the same cannot be claimed for inter-storey drift or dynamical methods. It is to be acknowledged that most experimental tests were carried out using inertial force methods, mostly with the use of airbags. In contrast, only a few were undertaken with dynamical methods and just two with inter-storey drift methods. It was found that inertial force and inter-storey drift methods differ widely. In particular, inertial force methods damage the infill, leaving the frame more or less intact. Conversely, drift heavily damages the frame, while infill only slightly. Openings were investigated, albeit with contrasting results. Namely, in all cases, it was found that openings do lower the deformational but not all load-bearing capacities. Furthermore, analytical models have shown contrasting results between themselves and with experimental data. Models' stabilities were checked with single- and multi-variable parametric analysis from which governing factors, influences of frame and other parameters were identified.
引用
收藏
页码:2191 / 2246
页数:56
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] ACI, AM CONSR I STRUCT J
  • [2] Akhoundi F, 2016, BRICK AND BLOCK MASONRY: TRENDS, INNOVATIONS AND CHALLENGES, P1147
  • [3] Akhoundi F, 2018, INT J ARCHIT HERIT, V18, P1
  • [4] Akhoundi F., 2015, 7 INT C SEISM EARTHQ
  • [5] Macromodeling of in- and out-of-plane behavior of unreinforced masonry infill walls
    Al Hanoun, M. H.
    Abrahamczyk, L.
    Schwarz, J.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 17 (01) : 519 - 535
  • [6] ANDERSON C, 1976, CONCRETE, V10, P27
  • [7] Angel R., 1996, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V12, P825
  • [8] Angel R. E., 1994, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [9] Anic F, 2018, 16 EUR C EARTHQ ENG
  • [10] Computational evaluation of experimental methodologies of out-of-plane behavior of framed-walls with openings
    Anic, Filip
    Penava, Davorin
    Abrahamczyk, Lars
    Sarhosis, Vasilis
    [J]. EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2019, 16 (03) : 265 - 277