Current practice and barriers of mesh-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction in China: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of 110 hospitals

被引:9
作者
Guo, Rong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Lun [1 ,2 ]
Su, Yonghui [1 ,2 ]
Xiu, Bingqiu [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Chi, Weiru [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Benlong [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yingying [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Ayong [1 ,2 ]
Shao, Zhimin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Jiong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Surg, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
EJSO | 2020年 / 46卷 / 01期
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Implant breast reconstruction; Mesh; Questionnaire survey; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The current National Practice Questionnaire of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) (NPQi) was to assess the clinical practice of mesh-assisted IBBR in China. Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 110 hospitals in China, which have more than 200 breast cancer operations performed in 2017. The survey mainly included questions on the type and timing of IBBR, questions about the use of TiLOOP Bra and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and the complications of IBBR. Results: IBBR was routinely carried out in 86.36% (95/110) hospitals. IBBR was the most frequently-used (65.7%, 4,296/6,534) BR after mastectomy with a median of 24 cases (IQR 7.5-65) in each hospital. TiLOOP (R) Bra and ADM were available in 49.5% and 33.7% hospitals, respectively. Hospitals with ADM offered were more likely to located in economically developed regions (65.6%), when compared with hospitals without any mesh offered (14/35, 40.0%, P= 0.036) and with only TiLOOP Bra offered (16/28, 57.1%, P=0.032). The surgery volume was largely variated from hospitals without any mesh offered (median 380 cases, IQR 304-550), with only TiLOOP Bra offered (median 790 cases, IQR 439-1096, P= 0.001) and with ADM offered (median 797 cases, IQR 497-1528, P.<0.001). Higher proportion of one-stage mesh-augmented direct-to-implant BR and lower proportion of autologous BR were observed in hospitals with mesh offered. The reported major complications were similar between hospitals with or without mesh offered. Conclusions: The NPQi has provided a valuable insight into the current practice of IBBR and mesh used in China. The introduction of mesh-assisted techniques has revolutionized the clinical practice. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 70
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction [J].
Breuing, Karl H. ;
Colwell, Amy S. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 59 (03) :250-255
[2]   Current Status of Breast Reconstruction in Southern China: A 15 Year, Single Institutional Experience of 20,551 Breast Cancer Patients [J].
Chen Jia-jian ;
Huang Nai-si ;
Xue Jing-yan ;
Yang Ben-long ;
Liu Guang-yu ;
Di Gen-hong ;
Shao Zhi-min ;
Wu Jiong .
MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (34) :e1399
[3]  
Chen Ying, 2014, Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, V36, P851
[4]   Retrospective Review of 331 Consecutive Immediate Single-Stage Implant Reconstructions with Acellular Dermal Matrix: Indications, Complications, Trends, and Costs [J].
Colwell, Amy S. ;
Damjanovic, Branimir ;
Zahedi, Bita ;
Medford-Davis, Laura ;
Hertl, Catherine ;
Austen, William G., Jr. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (06) :1170-1178
[5]   Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer [J].
Cordeiro, Peter G. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (15) :1590-1601
[6]   Immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction compared with one-stage permanent implant breast reconstruction: A multi-institutional comparison of short-term complications [J].
Davila, Armando A. ;
Mioton, Lauren M. ;
Chow, Geoffrey ;
Wang, Edward ;
Merkow, Ryan P. ;
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Fine, Neil ;
Kim, John Y. S. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2013, 47 (05) :344-349
[7]   Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial [J].
Dikmans, Rieky E. G. ;
Negenborn, Vera L. ;
Bouman, Mark-Bram ;
Winters, Hay A. H. ;
Twisk, Jos W. R. ;
Ruhe, P. Quinten ;
Mureau, Marc A. M. ;
Smit, Jan Maerten ;
Tuinder, Stefania ;
Eltahir, Yassir ;
Posch, Nicole A. ;
van Steveninck-Barends, Josephina M. ;
Meesters-Caberg, Marleen A. ;
van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J. ;
Ritt, Marco J. P. F. ;
Mullender, Margriet G. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (02) :251-258
[8]   Aesthetic Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction [J].
Forsberg, Clay G. ;
Kelly, David A. ;
Wood, Benjamin C. ;
Mastrangelo, Stephanie L. ;
DeFranzo, Anthony J. ;
Thompson, James T. ;
David, Lisa R. ;
Marks, Malcolm W. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 72 (06) :S116-S120
[9]   Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix [J].
Gamboa-Bobadilla, GM .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2006, 56 (01) :22-25
[10]   Current Trends in Breast Reconstruction Survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010 [J].
Gurunluoglu, Raffi ;
Gurunluoglu, Aslin ;
Williams, Susan A. ;
Tebockhorst, Seth .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 70 (01) :103-110