Accommodative Behavior of Eyes Wearing Aspheric Single Vision Contact Lenses

被引:8
作者
Altoaimi, Basal H. [1 ,2 ]
Almutairi, Meznah S. [1 ,2 ]
Kollbaum, Pete [1 ]
Bradley, Arthur [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Optometry, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] King Saud Univ, Dept Optometry, Coll Appl Med Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
RETINAL IMAGE QUALITY; SECONDARY SPHERICAL-ABERRATION; STIMULUS-RESPONSE FUNCTION; HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS; DEPTH-OF-FOCUS; POWER PROFILES; MONOCHROMATIC ABERRATIONS; INTRAOCULAR LENSES; MYOPIA; CONVERGENCE;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0000000000001121
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
SIGNIFICANCE: Wearing aspheric contact lenses adds significant amounts of negative spherical aberration (SA). Also, when accommodated and converged to near targets, pupil size shrinks and SA shift frompositive tomore negative direction. Interestingly, in this study, pupil miosis was fully or partially able to compensate for the additional accommodation-induced negative SA. PURPOSE: The present study aims to examine the accommodative response characteristics of young eyes fit with aspheric single vision contact lenses (SVCLs) that add significant negative SA to the eye responding to a wide range of accommodation stimuli. METHODS: Using a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer, the accommodation behavior in eight young adult eyes (mean age and spherical equivalent is 27.25 +/- 2.05 years and -1.75 +/- 1.80D, respectively) was measured while subjects fixated binocularly and monocularly 20/40 letter E, which were moved from 2 m to 20 cm (0.5 to 5D) in 0.25D steps. Using natural pupils, refractive state was defined using three standard criteria: the dioptric power that (1) minimized the root mean square error (minRMS), (2) best-fit paraxial, and (3) provided the peak image quality (peak IQ). RESULTS: Wearing aspheric lenses with negative SA shifts the mean SA of the unaccommodated eyes from + 0.05 aem (eyes only) to -0.029 aem (eyes + SVCL) and increases the negative SA for the eye + lens when accommodating from -0.029 to -0.07 aem for natural pupils. Aberration changes with accommodation were attenuated by the accommodative pupil miosis, which reduced binocular viewing pupil diameters from 3.9 to 3.3 mm. This alteration of the typical SA levels by the aspheric SVCL did not prevent accurate accommodation (mean +/- standard deviation accommodative lag under binocular viewing were -0.08 +/- 0.12D, -0.38 +/- 0.12D, and -0.26 +/- 0.08D for paraxial, minRMS, and peak IQ, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data clearly show that aspheric contact lenses designed to correct some or all of the unaccommodated eye's positive SA do not interfere with accommodation. Copyright (C) 2017 American Academy of Optometry
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 980
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Accommodation and pupil behaviour of binocularly viewing early presbyopes [J].
Almutairi, Meznah S. ;
Altoaimi, Basal H. ;
Bradley, Arthur .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2017, 37 (02) :128-140
[2]   Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance [J].
Applegate, RA ;
Marsack, JD ;
Ramos, R ;
Sarver, EJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (08) :1487-1495
[3]   Subjective depth-of-focus of the eye [J].
Atchison, DA ;
Charman, WN ;
Woods, RL .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (07) :511-520
[4]   Optimizing the subjective depth-of-focus with combinations of fourth- and sixth-order spherical aberration [J].
Benard, Yohann ;
Lopez-Gil, Norberto ;
Legras, Richard .
VISION RESEARCH, 2011, 51 (23-24) :2471-2477
[5]   Focus correction in an apodized system with spherical aberration [J].
Bernal-Molina, Paula ;
Francisco Castejon-Mochon, Jose ;
Bradley, Arthur ;
Lopez-Gil, Norberto .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2015, 32 (08) :1556-1563
[6]   Influence of spherical aberration, stimulus spatial frequency, and pupil apodisation on subjective refractions [J].
Bradley, Arthur ;
Xu, Renfeng ;
Thibos, Larry ;
Marin, Gildas ;
Hernandez, Martha .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2014, 34 (03) :309-320
[7]   Accommodation stimulus-response function and retinal image quality [J].
Buehren, T ;
Collins, MJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (10) :1633-1645
[8]   EFFECTS OF THE SEIDEL ABERRATIONS ON VISUAL TARGET DISCRIMINATION [J].
BURTON, GJ ;
HAIG, ND .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1984, 1 (04) :373-385
[9]   The eye in focus: accommodation and presbyopia [J].
Charman, W. Neil .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2008, 91 (03) :207-225
[10]   Validation of a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer [J].
Cheng, X ;
Himebaugh, NL ;
Kollbaum, PS ;
Thibos, LN ;
Bradley, A .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (08) :587-595