Conducting Configurational Comparative Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hands-On Tutorial for Applied Evaluation Scholars and Practitioners

被引:52
作者
Thiem, Alrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Rue Candolle 2 Bat Landolt, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
configurational comparative methods (CCMs); evaluation methods; qualitative comparative analysis (QCA); empirical research methods; FUZZY; QCA; COMPLEXITY; CHALLENGES; PITFALLS; CRISP;
D O I
10.1177/1098214016673902
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The search for necessary and sufficient causes of some outcome of interest, referred to as configurational comparative research, has long been one of the main preoccupations of evaluation scholars and practitioners. However, only the last three decades have witnessed the evolution of a set of formal methods that are sufficiently elaborate for this purpose. In this article, I provide a hands-on tutorial for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)currently the most popular configurational comparative method. In drawing on a recent evaluation of patient follow-through effectiveness in Lynch syndrome tumor-screening programs, I explain the search target of QCA, introduce its core concepts, guide readers through the procedural protocol of this method, and alert them to mistakes frequently made in QCA's use. An annotated replication file for the QCApro extension package for R accompanies this tutorial.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 433
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Balthasar A., 2006, EVALUATION, V12, P353
[2]  
Baumgartner M., 2015, 12 C EUR SOC ASS CZE
[3]   Model Ambiguities in Configurational Comparative Research [J].
Baumgartner, Michael ;
Thiem, Alrik .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2017, 46 (04) :954-987
[4]  
Baumgartner M, 2015, R J, V7, P176
[5]   Parsimony and Causality [J].
Baumgartner, Michael .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2015, 49 (02) :839-856
[6]   Inferring Causal Complexity [J].
Baumgartner, Michael .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2009, 38 (01) :71-101
[7]   Synthesizing diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews [J].
Baxter, S. ;
Killoran, A. ;
Kelly, M. P. ;
Goyder, E. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 124 (02) :99-106
[8]  
Befani B., 2007, EVALUATION-US, V13, P171, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1356389007075222, 10.1177/1356389007075222]
[9]   Between complexity and generalization: Addressing evaluation challenges with QCA [J].
Befani, Barbara .
EVALUATION, 2013, 19 (03) :269-283
[10]   Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis to understand complex policy problems [J].
Blackman, Tim ;
Wistow, Jonathan ;
Byrne, Dave .
EVALUATION, 2013, 19 (02) :126-140