The dominance of the private sector in the provision of emergency obstetric care: studies from Gujarat, India

被引:9
作者
Salazar, Mariano [1 ]
Vora, Kranti [2 ]
De Costa, Ayesha [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Tomtebodavagen 18a, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Indian Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Reprod & Child Hlth, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
关键词
EmOC; India; Gujarat; Facility-based; CASH TRANSFER; AVAILABILITY; DELIVERY; SERVICES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-016-1473-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: India has experienced a steep rise in institutional childbirth. The relative contributions of public and private sector facilities to emergency obstetric care (EmOC) has not been studied in this setting. This paper aims to study in three districts of Gujarat state, India:(a) the availability of EmOC facilities in the public and private sectors; (b) the availability and distribution of human resources for birth attendance in the two sectors; and (c) to benchmark the above against 2005 World Health Report benchmarks (WHR2005). Methods: A cross-sectional survey of obstetric care facilities reporting 30 or more births in the last three months was conducted (n = 159). Performance of EmOC signal functions and availability of human resources were assessed. Results: EmOC provision was dominated by private facilities (112/159) which were located mainly in district headquarters or small urban towns. The number of basic and comprehensive EmOC facilities was below WHR2005 benchmarks. A high number of private facilities performed C-sections but not all basic signal functions (72/159). Public facilities were the main EmOC providers in rural areas and 40/47 functioned at less than basic EmOC level. The rate of obstetricians per 1000 births was higher in the private sector. Conclusions: The private sector is the dominant EmOC provider in the state. Given the highly skewed distribution of facilities and resources in the private sector, state led partnerships with the private sector so that all women in the state receive care is important alongside strengthening the public sector.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Status of Emergency Obstetric Care in Six Developing Countries Five Years before the MDG Targets for Maternal and Newborn Health
    Ameh, Charles
    Msuya, Sia
    Hofman, Jan
    Raven, Joanna
    Mathai, Matthews
    van den Broek, Nynke
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [2] [Anonymous], MON EM OBST CAR HDB
  • [3] Averting Maternal Death and Disability (AMDD), 2010, Needs Assessment of Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care: Data Collection Modules
  • [4] Biswas AB, 2005, J HEALTH POPUL NUTR, V23, P266
  • [5] Maternal survival 2 - Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works
    Campbell, Oona M. R.
    Graham, Wendy J.
    [J]. LANCET, 2006, 368 (9543) : 1284 - 1299
  • [6] Competence of birth attendants at providing emergency obstetric care under India's JS']JSY conditional cash transfer program for institutional delivery: an assessment using case vignettes in Madhya Pradesh province
    Chaturvedi, Sarika
    Upadhyay, Sourabh
    De Costa, Ayesha
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2014, 14
  • [7] Commissionerate of Rural Development, 2014, SOC SURV 2002 03
  • [8] The State-Led Large Scale Public Private Partnership 'Chiranjeevi Program' to Increase Access to Institutional Delivery among Poor Women in Gujarat, India: How Has It Done? What Can We Learn?
    De Costa, Ayesha
    Vora, Kranti S.
    Ryan, Kayleigh
    Raman, Parvathy Sankara
    Santacatterina, Michele
    Mavalankar, Dileep
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05):
  • [9] Emergency obstetric care availability: a critical assessment of the current indicator
    Gabrysch, Sabine
    Zanger, Philipp
    Campbell, Oona M. R.
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2012, 17 (01) : 2 - 8
  • [10] Availability and distribution of, and geographic access to emergency obstetric care in Zambia
    Gabrysch, Sabine
    Simushi, Virginia
    Campbell, Oona M. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 114 (02) : 174 - 179