The Struggle of Indigenous Peoples to Maintain Their Spirituality in Latin America: Freedom of and from Religion(s), and Other Threats

被引:6
作者
Tomaselli, Alexandra [1 ]
Xanthaki, Alexandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Eurac Res, Inst Minor Rights, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
[2] Brunel Univ London, Brunel Law Sch, Coll Business Arts & Social Sci, London UB8 3PH, England
关键词
Indigenous Peoples; spirituality; cultural identity; land; traditional customs; Latin America; Ecuador; Bolivia; UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; CATHOLIC-CHURCH; CULTURAL RIGHTS; POLITICS; MOVEMENTS; CONSENT;
D O I
10.3390/rel12100869
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
This article argues that the (Western-oriented) right to religion has been proven inadequate in protecting Indigenous Peoples' rights. It recognizes that this is partly because of the distinctive characteristics of Indigenous religions, which differ from other dominant religions, but also because of the way in which religion has been used by colonialism with dramatic effects on Indigenous Peoples and their beliefs, spiritualities, and worldviews. The article focuses on Latin America to argue further that in addition to colonialism, the early Constitutions also attacked Indigenous religions. As Indigenous rights are more acknowledged in Latin America, we take this region as an excellent, albeit painful, example of how Indigenous religions have been pushed aside even in the most positive contexts. The article uses the constitutional and legal arrangements in Latin American states, mainly Ecuador and Bolivia, to critically assess the protection that these favorable to Indigenous Peoples legal systems' guarantee to Indigenous rights despite a persistent implementation gap. Also, this article highlights the weaknesses of the international system in mitigating the manifold threats that Indigenous Peoples have to face on a daily basis in their struggle to maintain and transmit their religions and spirituality, including the assault of other religions and sects into their communities and the so-called neo-extractivism. The article finally draws some concluding remarks and recommendations on how to improve the freedom of and violations from religion(s) of Indigenous Peoples in the context of Latin America as well as international law more broadly.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Aguilar Gonzalo., 2010, Pace International Law Review Online Companion, V2, P44
[2]  
Alfred Taiaiake., 2005, WASASE INDIGENOUS PA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Case 276/2003, Centre for Minority Rights Development (Kenya) and Minority Rights Group International on behalf of Endorois Welfare Council v Kenya
[4]  
Bello Alvaro., 2004, Etnicidad y ciudadania en America Latina. La accion colectiva de los pueblos indigenas
[5]  
Blakeney M, 2013, Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, V22, P391
[6]  
Bold Rosalyn., 2017, LAT AM CARIBB ETHN S, V12, P113
[7]  
Brand U, 2016, CIENC POLITICA, V11, P125
[8]   'The most we can hope for///' - Human rights and the politics of fatalism [J].
Brown, W .
SOUTH ATLANTIC QUARTERLY, 2004, 103 (2-3) :451-463
[9]  
Brown Wendy., 2002, LEFT LEGALISMLEFT CR, P420
[10]   (Neo-)extractivism - a new challenge for development theory from Latin America [J].
Burchardt, Hans-Juergen ;
Dietz, Kristina .
THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2014, 35 (03) :468-486