Measuring progress in status of land under forest landscape restoration using abiotic and biotic indicators

被引:30
作者
Dudley, Nigel [1 ,2 ]
Bhagwat, Shonil A. [3 ,4 ]
Harris, Jim [5 ]
Maginnis, Stewart [6 ]
Moreno, Jaime Garcia [7 ]
Mueller, Gregory M. [8 ]
Oldfield, Sara [9 ]
Walters, Gretchen [6 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Equilibrium Res, 47 Quays,Cumberland Rd, Bristol BS1 6UQ, Avon, England
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Open Univ, Dept Geog, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
[4] Open Univ, Open Space Res Ctr, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
[5] Cranfield Univ, Sch Water Energy & Environm, Coll Rd, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[6] Int Union Conservat Nat, Rue Mauverney 28, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland
[7] ESiLi, Het Haam 16, NL-6846 KW Arnhem, Netherlands
[8] Chicago Bot Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Rd, Glencoe, IL 60022 USA
[9] 5 Marshall Rd, Cambridge CB1 7TY, England
[10] UCL, Dept Anthropol, Taviton St, London WC1H 0BW, England
关键词
ecosystem functions; ecosystem services; forest; monitoring; restoration; thresholds; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; RESOURCES ASSESSMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ATLANTIC FOREST; BIODIVERSITY; BEETLES; SUCCESS; INVERTEBRATES; BIOINDICATORS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1111/rec.12632
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The paper suggests a minimum set of abiotic and biotic threshold indicators and progress indicators for forest landscape restoration (FLR), then also briefly discusses progress indicators of pressures and project outputs. FLR aims to restore multiple functions of forests at a landscape scale. It is predicated on the hypothesis that restoration produces enabling conditions for ecosystem services, including regulating services such as carbon sequestration and pollination, and provisioning services such as food and energy. As FLR gains greater uptake, it is increasingly important to monitor progress. The types of indicators required are influenced by the degree of forest loss and degradation. To measure the status of land under restoration, one or more abiotic and biotic threshold indicators are required, measuring the return of enabling conditions for restoration (soil quality, water, etc.), along with progress indicators measuring the reemergence of the ecosystem services. Although all elements of the proposed monitoring framework are well known, compiling them into a coherent system, suitable for application in a wide range of conditions, will take much further development.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 12
页数:8
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] You can't not choose: Embracing the role of choice in ecological restoration
    Allison, Stuart K.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2007, 15 (04) : 601 - 605
  • [2] Andersen AN, 2004, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V2, P291
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, PRINC GUID EC REST C
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, IUFRO WORLD SERIES
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2004, GETTING BIODIVERSITY, DOI DOI 10.7312/MCSH12764-016
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2013, ECOL RESTOR, DOI DOI 10.5822/978-1-59726-323-87
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2003, EC WELLB FRAM ASS
  • [8] Ecosystem Restoration is Now a Global Priority: Time to Roll up our Sleeves
    Aronson, James
    Alexander, Sasha
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2013, 21 (03) : 293 - 296
  • [9] The Potential Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Restoration of Degraded Lands
    Asmelash, Fisseha
    Bekele, Tamrat
    Birhane, Emiru
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [10] Dung beetles as indicators of tropical forest restoration success: Is it possible to recover species and functional diversity?
    Audino, Livia Dorneles
    Louzada, Julio
    Comita, Liza
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 169 : 248 - 257