Higher-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Meningiomas to Determine Intratumoral Consistency

被引:90
作者
Hughes, Joshua D. [1 ]
Fattahi, Nikoo [2 ]
Van Gompel, J. [1 ]
Arani, Arvin [2 ]
Meyer, Fredric [1 ]
Lanzino, Giuseppe [1 ]
Link, Michael J. [1 ]
Ehman, Richard [2 ]
Huston, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Consistency; Magnetic resonance elastography; Meningioma; MRE; Stiffness; INTRACRANIAL MENINGIOMAS; BRAIN; PREDICTION; MRI;
D O I
10.1227/NEU.0000000000000892
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND:Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) analyzes shear wave movement through tissue to determine stiffness. In a prior study, measurements with first-generation brain MRE techniques correlated with intraoperative observations of overall meningioma stiffness.OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a higher-resolution MRE technique to preoperatively detect intratumoral variations compared with surgeon assessment.METHODS:Fifteen meningiomas in 14 patients underwent MRE. Tumors with regions of distinctly different stiffness were considered heterogeneous. Intratumoral portions were considered hard if there was a significant area 6 kPa. A 5-point scale graded intraoperative consistency. A durometer semiquantitatively measured surgical specimen hardness. Statistics included (2), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicative values, and Spearman rank correlation coefficient.RESULTS:For MRE and surgery, 9 (60%) and 7 (47%) tumors were homogeneous, 6 (40%) and 8 (53%) tumors were heterogeneous, 6 (40%) and 10 (67%) tumors had hard portions, and 14 (93%) and 12 (80%) tumors had soft portions, respectively. MRE sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were as follows: for heterogeneity, 75%, 100%, 100%, and 87%; for hardness, 60%, 100%, 100%, and 56%; and for softness, 100%, 33%, 86%, and 100%. Overall, 10 tumors (67%) matched well with MRE and intraoperative consistency and correlated between intraoperative observations (P = .02) and durometer readings (P = .03). Tumor size 3.5 cm or vascular tumors were more likely to be inconsistent (P < .05).CONCLUSION:MRE was excellent at ruling in heterogeneity with hard portions but less effective in ruling out heterogeneity and hard portions, particularly in tumors more vascular or <3.5 cm. MRE is the first technology capable of prospectively evaluating intratumoral stiffness and, with further refinement, will likely prove useful in preoperative planning.ABBREVIATIONS:MRE, magnetic resonance elastographyNPV, negative predictive valuePPV, positive predictive valueROI, region of interest
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 658
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   MRI OF INTRACRANIAL MENINGIOMAS - CORRELATIONS WITH HISTOLOGY AND PHYSICAL CONSISTENCY [J].
CARPEGGIANI, P ;
CRISI, G ;
TREVISAN, C .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 1993, 35 (07) :532-536
[2]   Slip elastography: A novel method for visualising and characterizing adherence between two surfaces in contact [J].
Chakraborty, Aabir ;
Bamber, Jeffrey C. ;
Dorward, Neil L. .
ULTRASONICS, 2012, 52 (03) :364-376
[3]   In vivo brain viscoelastic properties measured by magnetic resonance elastography [J].
Green, Michael A. ;
Bilston, Lynne E. ;
Sinkus, Ralph .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2008, 21 (07) :755-764
[4]  
Hoover Jason M, 2011, Surg Neurol Int, V2, P142, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.85983
[5]   Prediction of meningioma consistency using fractional anisotropy value measured by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Kashimura, Hiroshi ;
Inoue, Takashi ;
Ogasawara, Kuniaki ;
Arai, Hiroshi ;
Otawara, Yasunari ;
Kanbara, Yoshiyuki ;
Ogawa, Akira .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 107 (04) :784-787
[6]   COMPARISON OF CONSISTENCY OF MENINGIOMAS AND CT APPEARANCES [J].
KENDALL, B ;
PULLICINO, P .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 1979, 18 (04) :173-176
[7]   Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain [J].
Kruse, Scott A. ;
Rose, Gregory H. ;
Glaser, Kevin J. ;
Manduca, Armando ;
Felmlee, Joel P. ;
Jack, Clifford R., Jr. ;
Ehman, Richard L. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 39 (01) :231-237
[8]   Magnetic Resonance Elastography: A Review [J].
Mariappan, Yogesh K. ;
Glaser, Kevin J. ;
Ehman, Richard L. .
CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2010, 23 (05) :497-511
[9]   Preoperative assessment of meningioma stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography [J].
Murphy, Matthew C. ;
Huston, John, III ;
Glaser, Kevin J. ;
Manduca, Armando ;
Meyer, Fredric B. ;
Lanzino, Giuseppe ;
Morris, Jonathan M. ;
Felmlee, Joel P. ;
Ehman, Richard L. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 118 (03) :643-648
[10]   Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography [J].
Sack, Ingolf ;
Beierbach, Bernd ;
Hamhaber, Uwe ;
Klatt, Dieter ;
Braun, Juergen .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2008, 21 (03) :265-271