Energy Embodiment of Water Supply: A Comparison between the US and China

被引:2
作者
Mo, Weiwei [1 ]
Zhang, Qiong [1 ]
Wang, Rongchang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Tongji Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, MOE, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
PROGRESS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (ICEESD2011), PTS 1-5 | 2012年 / 356-360卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 上海市科技启明星计划;
关键词
Water supply; embodied energy; direct/indirect energy; life cycle assessment;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.356-360.2175
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the rapid growth of world's economy and population, the demand for water and energy has been increasing accordingly. Moreover, water and energy are interrelated and form a reinforcing feedback loop. Energy is used not only onsite of water supply systems, but also indirectly for producing materials used in the water systems. As a result, it is important to understand and evaluate the energy embodiment of water supply for sustainable water and energy management. This study uses the Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment software to estimate and compare the embodied energy of one China water supply system (System A) and one US water supply system (System B). It has been found that System B in the US has comparable direct operational energy consumption with System A in China; however, System B consumes much more indirect energy and constructional energy than System A. Possible reasons for the higher indirect energy use in System B might be more administrative and engineering (maintenance and repairing) services involved, lower transportation efficiency, more self water usage within the system and higher labor rates. To satisfy the water demand for the large population, China's water supply systems have to reduce direct energy consumption during the operation phase by conducting energy budget and adopting energy efficient technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:2175 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 1006787 EPRI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ASE ALL SAV EN US AG
[3]  
Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute, 1997, CARNEGIE MELLON U GR
[4]  
DOE, 2006, US DEP EN REP C
[5]  
Griffiths-Sattenspiel B., 2010, RIVER NETWORK REPORT
[6]  
Kahrl F., 2008, WATER POLICY
[7]  
Lei M., 2006, CANADIAN SOCIAL SCI, V2
[8]   Sustainability criteria as a tool in the development of new sewage treatment methods [J].
Mels, AR ;
van Nieuwenhuijzen, AF ;
van der Graaf, JHJM ;
Klapwijk, B ;
de Koning, J ;
Rulkens, WH .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (05) :243-250
[9]   Measuring the Embodied Energy in Drinking Water Supply Systems: A Case Study in The Great Lakes Region [J].
Mo, Weiwei ;
Nasiri, Fuzhan ;
Eckelman, Matthew J. ;
Zhang, Qiong ;
Zimmerman, Julie B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (24) :9516-9521
[10]  
Pierpont Skip, COMMUNICATION