Groups 4 Health versus cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression and loneliness in young people: randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial with 12-month follow-up

被引:36
作者
Cruwys, Tegan [1 ]
Haslam, Catherine [2 ]
Rathbone, Joanne A. [2 ]
Williams, Elyse [2 ]
Haslam, S. Alexander [2 ]
Walter, Zoe C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Psychol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Social identity; group psychotherapy; mood disorders; mental health; adolescence; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; INTERVENTIONS; ADOLESCENTS; CHILDREN; ANXIETY; VERSION;
D O I
10.1192/bjp.2021.128
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Depression treatments are typically less effective for young people than for adults. However, treatments rarely target loneliness, which is a key risk factor in the onset, maintenance and development of depression. Aims This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel loneliness intervention, Groups 4 Health (G4H), relative to the best-practice treatment of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in reducing loneliness and depression over a 12-month period (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12618000440224). Method The study was a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial comparing G4H with dose-controlled group CBT. Participants were 174 people aged 15-25 years experiencing loneliness and clinically significant symptoms of depression, who were not in receipt of adjunct treatment. Participants were recruited from mental health services in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Randomisation was conducted using computer software. Follow-up assessments and statistical analyses were masked to allocation. Both interventions consisted of five 75 min group-based psychotherapy sessions. The primary outcomes were depression and loneliness, with a non-inferiority margin of 2.20 for depression. Results The trial enrolled 174 participants between 24 April 2018 and 25 May 2019, with 84 in the G4H condition and 90 in the CBT condition. All randomised participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses (n = 174). The pre-post effect sizes for depression were d(G4H) = -0.71 and d(CBT) = -0.91. For loneliness, they were d(G4H) = -1.07 and d(CBT) = -0.89. At 12-month follow-up, the absolute difference between groups on depression was 1.176 (95% CI -1.94 to 4.29) and on loneliness it was -0.679 (95% CI -1.43 to 0.07). No adverse effects were observed. Conclusions G4H was non-inferior to CBT for depression and showed a slight advantage over CBT for loneliness that emerged after treatment completion.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 147
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Bentley S.V., 2020, TOGETHER APART PSYCH, P73
  • [2] Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions
    Cattan, M
    White, M
    Bond, J
    Learmouth, A
    [J]. AGEING & SOCIETY, 2005, 25 : 41 - 67
  • [3] Comparative efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Zhou, Xinyu
    Del Giovane, Cinzia
    Hetrick, Sarah E.
    Qin, Bin
    Whittington, Craig
    Coghill, David
    Zhang, Yuqing
    Hazell, Philip
    Leucht, Stefan
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Pu, Juncai
    Cohen, David
    Ravindran, Arun V.
    Liu, Yiyun
    Michael, Kurt D.
    Yang, Lining
    Liu, Lanxiang
    Xie, Peng
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 388 (10047) : 881 - 890
  • [4] The connecting adolescents to reduce relapse (CARR) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of Groups 4 Health and cognitive behaviour therapy in young people
    Cruwys, Tegan
    Haslam, Catherine
    Walter, Zoe C.
    Rathbone, Joanne
    Williams, Elyse
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [5] Feeling connected again: Interventions that increase social identification reduce depression symptoms in community and clinical settings
    Cruwys, Tegan
    Haslam, S. Alexander
    Dingle, Genevieve A.
    Jetten, Jolanda
    Hornsey, Matthew J.
    Chong, E. M. Desdemona
    Oei, Tian P. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2014, 159 : 139 - 146
  • [6] The effect of loneliness on depression: A meta-analysis
    Erzen, Evren
    Cikrikci, Ozkan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 64 (05) : 427 - 435
  • [7] Burden of Depressive Disorders by Country, Sex, Age, and Year: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
    Ferrari, Alize J.
    Charlson, Fiona J.
    Norman, Rosana E.
    Patten, Scott B.
    Freedman, Greg
    Murray, Christopher J. L.
    Vos, Theo
    Whiteford, Harvey A.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2013, 10 (11)
  • [8] Garcia-Escalera J., 2016, Revista de Psicopatologia y Psicologia Clinica, V21, P147, DOI [DOI 10.5944/RPPC.VOL.21.NUM.3.2016.17811, 10.5944/rppc.vol.21.num.3., DOI 10.1016/J.PSICOE.2020.05.003]
  • [9] GROUPS 4 HEALTH Reduces Loneliness and Social Anxiety in Adults With Psychological Distress: Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Haslam, Catherine
    Cruwys, Tegan
    Chang, Melissa X-L
    Bentley, Sarah, V
    Haslam, S. Alexander
    Dingle, Genevieve A.
    Jetten, Jolanda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 87 (09) : 787 - 801
  • [10] GROUPS 4 HEALTH: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health
    Haslam, Catherine
    Cruwys, Tegan
    Haslam, S. Alexander
    Dingle, Genevieve
    Chang, Melissa Xue-Ling
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 194 : 188 - 195