Large-scale flash flood warning in China using deep learning

被引:17
作者
Zhao, Gang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Ronghua [3 ]
Yang, Mingxiang [3 ]
Tu, Tongbi [4 ]
Ma, Meihong [5 ]
Hong, Yang [6 ]
Wang, Xiekang [7 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Inst Water Resources, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol BS8 1QU, Avon, England
[3] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Guangzhou 519082, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Tianjin Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Civil Engn & Environm Sci, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[7] Sichuan Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul & Mt River Engn, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Flash flood warning; Deep learning; Mountainous and hilly areas; China; MOUNTAINOUS AREAS; RAINFALL THRESHOLD; DEBRIS FLOWS; METHODOLOGY; RESOLUTION; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127222
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Flash flood warning (FFW) systems play a fundamental role in flood hazard prevention and mitigation. In this study, we propose the first deep learning-based approach for large-scale FFW and demonstrate the application of this approach to mountainous and hilly areas of China. Specifically, the time series of precipitation before flash floods and three spatial features (maximum daily precipitation, curve number, and slope) are selected as predictors. A long short-term memory (LSTM)-based approach is adopted to predict the occurrence of flash floods, and we compare this approach with two widely used FFW methods, namely the rainfall triggering index (RTI) and flash flood guidance (FFG). The results demonstrate the following: (1) The LSTM-based approach provided a reliable FFW 1 day ahead with a hit rate (HR) of 0.84 and false alarm rate (FAR) of 0.09. It demonstrated moderate warning performance 2 days before flash floods, with an HR of 0.66 and FAR of 0.21. (2) The LSTMbased approach outperformed the benchmark RTI and FFG methods, achieving the highest critical success index (CSI) of 0.77. The FFG also provided satisfactory performance, with a CSI of 0.71, and the RTI demonstrated the lowest performance (CSI = 0.68). (3) The LSTM-based approach provides better results (CSI = 0.75) than RTI (CSI = 0.68) when only the time series of precipitation is used for prediction. The performance of the LSTMbased approach can be improved by considering the spatial features and a long time series of precipitation during model development. (4) The proposed approach did not exacerbate the effect of precipitation uncertainty on the flash flood warning; and we suggest using ensemble results for FFW to reduce the uncertainty caused by small or unbalanced learning samples. We conclude that the proposed approach is a valid method for large-scale FFW without using commercially sensitive observations, and can improve the capabilities of flood disaster mitigation, particularly in ungauged areas.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [11] Predicting flood susceptibility using LSTM neural networks
    Fang, Zhice
    Wang, Yi
    Peng, Ling
    Hong, Haoyuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 594 (594)
  • [12] A compilation of data on European flash floods
    Gaume, Eric
    Bain, Valerie
    Bernardara, Pietro
    Newinger, Olivier
    Barbuc, Mihai
    Bateman, Allen
    Blaskovicova, Lotta
    Bloeschl, Guenter
    Borga, Marco
    Dumitrescu, Alexandru
    Daliakopoulos, Ioannis
    Garcia, Joachim
    Irimescu, Anisoara
    Kohnova, Silvia
    Koutroulis, Aristeidis
    Marchi, Lorenzo
    Matreata, Simona
    Medina, Vicente
    Preciso, Emanuele
    Sempere-Torres, Daniel
    Stancalie, Gheorghe
    Szolgay, Jan
    Tsanis, Ioannis
    Velasco, David
    Viglione, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2009, 367 (1-2) : 70 - 78
  • [13] Georgakakos K.P., 2018, WMO Bulletin, V67, P37
  • [14] Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM
    Gers, FA
    Schmidhuber, J
    Cummins, F
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2000, 12 (10) : 2451 - 2471
  • [15] A review of advances in flash flood forecasting
    Hapuarachchi, H. A. P.
    Wang, Q. J.
    Pagano, T. C.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2011, 25 (18) : 2771 - 2784
  • [16] Analysis of flash flood disaster characteristics in China from 2011 to 2015
    He, Bingshun
    Huang, Xianlong
    Ma, Meihong
    Chang, Qingrui
    Tu, Yong
    Li, Qing
    Zhang, Ke
    Hong, Yang
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2018, 90 (01) : 407 - 420
  • [17] A Brief review of flood forecasting techniques and their applications
    Jain, Sharad Kumar
    Mani, Pankaj
    Jain, Sanjay K.
    Prakash, Pavithra
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Tullos, Desiree
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Agarwal, S. P.
    Dimri, A. P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, 2018, 16 (03) : 329 - 344
  • [18] Joyce RJ, 2004, J HYDROMETEOROL, V5, P487, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0487:CAMTPG>2.0.CO
  • [19] 2
  • [20] Kapos V, 2000, MT RES DEV, V20, P378, DOI 10.1659/0276-4741(2000)020[0378:UWWSMA]2.0.CO