Large-scale flash flood warning in China using deep learning

被引:17
作者
Zhao, Gang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Ronghua [3 ]
Yang, Mingxiang [3 ]
Tu, Tongbi [4 ]
Ma, Meihong [5 ]
Hong, Yang [6 ]
Wang, Xiekang [7 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Inst Water Resources, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol BS8 1QU, Avon, England
[3] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Guangzhou 519082, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Tianjin Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Civil Engn & Environm Sci, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[7] Sichuan Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul & Mt River Engn, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Flash flood warning; Deep learning; Mountainous and hilly areas; China; MOUNTAINOUS AREAS; RAINFALL THRESHOLD; DEBRIS FLOWS; METHODOLOGY; RESOLUTION; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127222
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Flash flood warning (FFW) systems play a fundamental role in flood hazard prevention and mitigation. In this study, we propose the first deep learning-based approach for large-scale FFW and demonstrate the application of this approach to mountainous and hilly areas of China. Specifically, the time series of precipitation before flash floods and three spatial features (maximum daily precipitation, curve number, and slope) are selected as predictors. A long short-term memory (LSTM)-based approach is adopted to predict the occurrence of flash floods, and we compare this approach with two widely used FFW methods, namely the rainfall triggering index (RTI) and flash flood guidance (FFG). The results demonstrate the following: (1) The LSTM-based approach provided a reliable FFW 1 day ahead with a hit rate (HR) of 0.84 and false alarm rate (FAR) of 0.09. It demonstrated moderate warning performance 2 days before flash floods, with an HR of 0.66 and FAR of 0.21. (2) The LSTMbased approach outperformed the benchmark RTI and FFG methods, achieving the highest critical success index (CSI) of 0.77. The FFG also provided satisfactory performance, with a CSI of 0.71, and the RTI demonstrated the lowest performance (CSI = 0.68). (3) The LSTM-based approach provides better results (CSI = 0.75) than RTI (CSI = 0.68) when only the time series of precipitation is used for prediction. The performance of the LSTMbased approach can be improved by considering the spatial features and a long time series of precipitation during model development. (4) The proposed approach did not exacerbate the effect of precipitation uncertainty on the flash flood warning; and we suggest using ensemble results for FFW to reduce the uncertainty caused by small or unbalanced learning samples. We conclude that the proposed approach is a valid method for large-scale FFW without using commercially sensitive observations, and can improve the capabilities of flood disaster mitigation, particularly in ungauged areas.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] A European precipitation index for extreme rain-storm and flash flood early warning
    Alfieri, L.
    Thielen, J.
    [J]. METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 22 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [2] A quantitative methodology for the assessment of the regional economic vulnerability to flash floods
    Aroca-Jimenez, Estefania
    Bodoque, Jose M.
    Garcia, Juan A.
    Diez-Herrero, Andres
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2018, 565 : 386 - 399
  • [3] Can deep learning algorithms outperform benchmark machine learning algorithms in flood susceptibility modeling?
    Binh Thai Pham
    Chinh Luu
    Tran Van Phong
    Phan Trong Trinh
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Renoud, Somayeh
    Asadi, Shahrokh
    Hiep Van Le
    von Meding, Jason
    Clague, John J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 592
  • [4] Storm rainfall conditions for floods and debris flows from recently burned areas in southwestern Colorado and southern California
    Cannon, Susan H.
    Gartner, Joseph E.
    Wilson, Raymond C.
    Bowers, James C.
    Laber, Jayme L.
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2008, 96 (3-4) : 250 - 269
  • [5] Characteristics of rainfall triggering of debris flows in the Chenyulan watershed, Taiwan
    Chen, J. C.
    Jan, C. D.
    Huang, W. S.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 13 (04) : 1015 - 1023
  • [6] CONUS-Wide Evaluation of National Weather Service Flash Flood Guidance Products
    Clark, Robert A.
    Gourley, Jonathan J.
    Flamig, Zachary L.
    Hong, Yang
    Clark, Edward
    [J]. WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2014, 29 (02) : 377 - 392
  • [7] Comparison of two early warning systems for regional flash flood hazard forecasting
    Corral, Caries
    Berenguer, Marc
    Sempere-Torres, Daniel
    Poletti, Laura
    Silvestro, Francesco
    Rebora, Nicola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 572 : 603 - 619
  • [8] Crazier M.J., 1980, P 3 AUSTR NZ C GEOME, p2
  • [9] Cutter SL, 2008, CLIMATE EXTREMES AND SOCIETY, P279, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511535840.017
  • [10] Proposal of a flash flood impact severity scale for the classification and mapping of flash flood impacts
    Diakakis, M.
    Deligiannakis, G.
    Antoniadis, Z.
    Melaki, M.
    Katsetsiadou, N. K.
    Andreadakis, E.
    Spyrou, N., I
    Gogou, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 590 (590)