Second-Look US Examination of MR-Detected Breast Lesions

被引:41
作者
Candelaria, Rosalind [1 ,2 ]
Fornage, Bruno D. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] St Lukes Episcopal Hosp, Singleton Associates PA, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
breast; MRI; ultrasound; HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; CANCER; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; SURVEILLANCE; POPULATION; SONOGRAPHY; CARCINOMA; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1002/jcu.20784
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Purpose: To review our institutional experience in using second-look ultrasound (SLUS) to identify breast lesions initially detected on MR imaging that were indeterminate or suspicious for malignancy. Methods: This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant retrospective review included 83 women with 131 lesions initially identified as indeterminate or suspicious for malignancy on MR imaging from February 1, 2008 through July 31, 2009. An SLUS correlate was confirmed on the basis of concordant location, size, and morphologic features. The detection rate of SLUS was determined. Patients' demographics, lesion size, and MR imaging morphologic features (focus, mass, non-masslike) were reviewed to identify which factors led to successful detection on SLUS. Likelihood ratio chi(2) tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: SLUS correlates were found for 88 of 131 (67%) lesions initially detected on MR imaging; 27 of 88 (31%) were malignant. SLUS detected foci (67%) and masses (73%) more frequently than it did non-masslike lesions (54%). The detection rate of SLUS was independent of lesion size on MR imaging. Malignant lesions were not more likely than benign lesions to be detected on SLUS (61% versus 70%). Conclusions: SLUS provides value in the clinical workup of breast lesions that are indeterminate or suspicious for malignancy. It identified two thirds of the MR-detected lesions evaluated and permitted performance of US-guided needle biopsy on 70 of 88 lesions. The likelihood of finding MR-detected lesions on SLUS was significantly higher for foci and masses than for non-masslike lesions (P < 0.05). (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 39: 115-121, 2011; Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20784
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Significance of Breast Lesion Descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI Lexicon
    Agrawal, Garima
    Su, Min-Ying
    Nalcioglu, Orhan
    Feig, Stephen A.
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    [J]. CANCER, 2009, 115 (07) : 1363 - 1380
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, ATLAS BREAST IMAGING
  • [3] Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging
    Bedrosian, I
    Mick, R
    Orel, SG
    Schnall, M
    Reynolds, C
    Spitz, FR
    Callans, LS
    Buzby, GP
    Rosato, EF
    Fraker, DL
    Czerniecki, BJ
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 98 (03) : 468 - 473
  • [4] Utility of Targeted Sonography for Breast Lesions That Were Suspicious on MRI
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Eby, Peter R.
    Peacock, Sue
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (04) : 1128 - 1134
  • [5] Community-Based Practice Experience of Unsuspected Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormalities Evaluated With Second-Look Sonography
    Destounis, Stamatia
    Arieno, Andrea
    Somerville, Patricia A.
    Seifert, Posy J.
    Murphy, Philip
    Morgan, Renee
    Skolny, Melissa
    Hanson, Sarah
    Young, Wende
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (10) : 1337 - 1346
  • [6] Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition
    Kriege, M
    Brekelmans, CTM
    Boetes, C
    Besnard, PE
    Zonderland, HM
    Obdeijn, IM
    Manoliu, RA
    Kok, T
    Peterse, H
    Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA
    Muller, SH
    Meijer, S
    Oosterwijk, JC
    Beex, LVAM
    Tollenaar, RAEM
    de Koning, HJ
    Rutgers, EJT
    Klijn, JGM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (05) : 427 - 437
  • [7] Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer
    Kuhl, CK
    Schrading, S
    Leutner, CC
    Morakkabati-Spitz, N
    Wardelmann, E
    Fimmers, R
    Kuhn, W
    Schild, HH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (33) : 8469 - 8476
  • [8] Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: Utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US
    LaTrenta, LR
    Menell, JH
    Morris, EA
    Abramson, AF
    Dershaw, DD
    Liberman, L
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (03) : 856 - 861
  • [9] Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS)
    Leach, MO
    Boggis, CRM
    Dixon, AK
    Easton, DF
    Eeles, RA
    Evans, DGR
    Gilbert, FF
    Griebsch, I
    Hoff, RJC
    Kessar, P
    Lakhani, SR
    Moss, SM
    Nerurkar, A
    Padhani, AR
    Pointon, LJ
    Thompson, D
    Warren, RML
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 365 (9473) : 1769 - 1778
  • [10] Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: Prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Isaacs, Claudine
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Pisano, Etta D.
    Ascher, Susan M.
    Weatherall, Paul T.
    Bluemke, David A.
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Marcom, P. Kelly
    Armstrong, Deborah K.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    Tomlinson, Gail
    Skates, Steven J.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (02) : 381 - 388