Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services

被引:238
作者
Spake, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
Lasseur, Remy [3 ]
Crouzat, Emilie [3 ]
Bullock, James M. [4 ]
Lavorel, Sandra [3 ]
Parks, Katherine E. [5 ]
Schaafsma, Marije [1 ,2 ]
Bennett, Elena M. [6 ,7 ]
Maes, Joachim [8 ]
Mulligan, Mark [9 ]
Mouchet, Maud [10 ]
Peterson, Garry D. [11 ]
Schulp, Catharina J. E. [12 ]
Thuiller, Wilfried [3 ]
Turner, Monica G. [13 ]
Verburg, Peter H. [14 ]
Eigenbrod, Felix [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Biol Sci, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Geog & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[3] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Lab Ecol Alpine, CS 40700, F-38058 Grenoble 9, France
[4] NERC Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Maclean Bldg,Benson Lane, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Environm, Ctr Environm Sci, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[6] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, 21111 Lakeshore, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ H9X 3V9, Canada
[7] McGill Univ, McGill Sch Environm, 21111 Lakeshore, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ H9X 3V9, Canada
[8] Joint Res Ctr, European Commiss, Via E Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
[9] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, Environm Dynam Res Grp, London WC2R 2LS, England
[10] CNRS, UPMC, MNHN, Ctr Ecol & Sci Conservat,UMR 7204,CP135, 43 Rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France
[11] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Kreaftriket 2B, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[12] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Earth Sci, Environm Geog, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[13] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Zool, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[14] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Res Unit Landscape Dynam, Zurchetstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2017年 / 47卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 瑞典研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Cross-study comparison; Ecosystem services; French Alps; Land use; Social-ecological systems; Trade-off; Natural capital; Biodiversity; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; LAND SYSTEMS; SCALES; MULTIFUNCTIONALITY; ASSOCIATIONS; CHALLENGES; MULTISCALE; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Multiple ecosystem services (ES) can respond similarly to social and ecological factors to form bundles. Identifying key social-ecological variables and understanding how they co-vary to produce these consistent sets of ES may ultimately allow the prediction and modelling of ES bundles, and thus, help us understand critical synergies and trade-offs across landscapes. Such an understanding is essential for informing better management of multi-functional landscapes and minimising costly trade-offs. However, the relative importance of different social and biophysiCal drivers of ES bundles in different types of social-ecological systems remains unclear. As such, a bottom-up understanding of the determinants of ES bundles is a critical research gap in ES and sustainability science. Here, we evaluate the current methods used in ES bundle science and synthesize these into four steps that capture the plurality of methods used to examine predictors of ES bundles. We then apply these four steps to a cross-study comparison (North and South French Alps) of relationships between social-ecological variables and ES bundles, as it is widely advocated that cross-study comparisons are necessary for achieving a general understanding of predictors of ES associations. We use the results of this case study to assess the strengths and limitations of current approaches for understanding distributions of ES bundles. We conclude that inconsistency of spatial scale remains the primary barrier for understanding and predicting ES bundles. We suggest a hypothesis-driven approach is required to predict relationships between ES, and we outline the research required for such an understanding to emerge.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 50
页数:14
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Anderson B. J., 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, P88
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, OPENNESS REFERENCE B
  • [3] How to choose geographical units in ecological studies: Proposal and application to campylobacteriosis
    Arsenault, Julie
    Michel, Pascal
    Berke, Olaf
    Ravel, Andre
    Gosselin, Pierre
    [J]. SPATIAL AND SPATIO-TEMPORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 7 : 11 - 24
  • [4] Quantifying and Mapping Ecosystem Services Supplies and Demands: A Review of Remote Sensing Applications
    Ayanu, Yohannes Zergaw
    Conrad, Christopher
    Nauss, Thomas
    Wegmann, Martin
    Koellner, Thomas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (16) : 8529 - 8541
  • [5] Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Cramer, Wolfgang
    Begossi, Alpina
    Cundill, Georgina
    Diaz, Sandra
    Egoh, Benis N.
    Geijzendorffer, Ilse R.
    Krug, Cornelia B.
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Lazos, Elena
    Lebel, Louis
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Meyfroidt, Patrick
    Mooney, Harold A.
    Nel, Jeanne L.
    Pascual, Unai
    Payet, Karine
    Perez Harguindeguy, Natalia
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Prieur-Richard, Anne-Hele Ne
    Reyers, Belinda
    Roebeling, Peter
    Seppelt, Ralf
    Solan, Martin
    Tschakert, Petra
    Tscharntke, Teja
    Turner, B. L., II
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Viglizzo, Ernesto F.
    White, Piran C. L.
    Woodward, Guy
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 14 : 76 - 85
  • [6] Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Gordon, Line J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) : 1394 - 1404
  • [7] Berkes F, 2000, LINKING SOCIAL ECOLO
  • [8] Borcard D, 2011, USE R, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7976-6
  • [9] AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS
    BOX, GEP
    COX, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1964, 26 (02) : 211 - 252
  • [10] Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    Kroll, Franziska
    Nedkov, Stoyan
    Mueller, Felix
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 17 - 29