Reliability of the nociceptive blink reflex evoked by electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve in humans

被引:11
作者
Costa, Yuri Martins [1 ,2 ]
Baad-Hansen, Lene [2 ,3 ]
Bonjardim, Leonardo Rigoldi [1 ]
Rodrigues Conti, Paulo Cesar [4 ]
Svensson, Peter [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Sect Head & Face Physiol, Dept Biol Sci, Al Octvio Pinheiro Brisola 9-75, BR-17012901 Bauru, Brazil
[2] SCON, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Sect Orofacial Pain & Jaw Funct, Dept Dent & Oral Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Prosthodont, Bauru Sch Dent, Bauru, Brazil
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Huddinge, Sweden
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Nociceptive blink reflex; Trigeminal nerve; Reliability; Intraclass correlation coefficient; ATYPICAL ODONTALGIA; BRAIN-STEM; PAIN; GUIDELINES; MODULATION; AGREEMENT; ELECTRODE;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-016-2042-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The nociceptive blink reflex (nBR) can be useful to investigate trigeminal nociceptive function. The aim of this study was to estimate the reliability of the nBR evoked by electrical stimulation of the three branches of the trigeminal nerve under the following conditions: over time (test-retest and intrarater reliability) and by two examiners (interrater reliability). Twenty-one healthy participants were evaluated in two sessions (24 h apart). The nBR was elicited by a so-called "nociceptive-specific" electrode placed over the entry zone of the right supraorbital (V1R), infraorbital (V2R), mental (V3R), and left infraorbital (V2L) nerve. The outcomes were individual electrical sensory (I (0)) and pain thresholds (I (P)); root mean square (RMS), area-under-the-curve (AUC), and onset latencies of R2 responses (determined twice after a recalibration session); and stimulus-evoked pain on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Kappa statistics were computed (alpha = 5%). ICCs were fair to excellent in 82% of the psychophysical measures (fair 21%, good 31%, excellent 30%) and in 86% of V1R, V2R, and V2L nBR parameters, whereas 52% of V3R showed poor reliability. ICCs for intrarater reliability were fair to good in 70% of measurements (fair 20%, good 50%) and in 75% of interrater measurements after the recalibration (fair 55%, good 20%). All kappa values showed at least fair agreement and the majority of the nBR measures (93%) presented moderate to excellent reliability. The nBR and its associated psychophysical measures can be considered a sufficiently reliable test. The nBR can be recommended as an electrophysiological technique to assess trigeminal nociceptive function.
引用
收藏
页码:2453 / 2463
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, MEASUREMENT MED PRAC, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511996214, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511996214.005]
[2]  
Baad-Hansen L, 2005, J OROFAC PAIN, V19, P239
[3]   Reliability of intra-oral quantitative sensory testing (QST) in patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls - a multicentre study [J].
Baad-Hansen, L. ;
Pigg, M. ;
Yang, G. ;
List, T. ;
Svensson, P. ;
Drangsholt, M. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 42 (02) :127-135
[4]   Blink reflexes in patients with atypical odontalgia and matched healthy controls [J].
Baad-Hansen, Lene ;
List, Thomas ;
Kaube, Holger ;
Jensen, Troels S. ;
Svensson, Peter .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 172 (04) :498-506
[5]   Value of quantitative sensory testing in neurological and pain disorders: NeuPSIG consensus [J].
Backonja, Miroslav 'Misha'' ;
Attal, Nadine ;
Baron, Ralf ;
Bouhassira, Didier ;
Drangholt, Mark ;
Dyck, Peter J. ;
Edwards, Robert R. ;
Freeman, Roy ;
Gracely, Richard ;
Haanpaa, Maija H. ;
Hansson, Per ;
Hatem, Samar M. ;
Krumova, Elena K. ;
Jensen, Troels S. ;
Maier, Christoph ;
Mick, Gerard ;
Rice, Andrew S. ;
Rolke, Roman ;
Treede, Rolf-Detlef ;
Serra, Jordi ;
Toelle, Thomas ;
Tugnoli, Valeri ;
Walk, David ;
Walalce, Mark S. ;
Ware, Mark ;
Yarnitsky, David ;
Ziegler, Dan .
PAIN, 2013, 154 (09) :1807-1819
[6]   Reliability and validity in a nutshell [J].
Bannigan, Katrina ;
Watson, Roger .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2009, 18 (23) :3237-3243
[7]   Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies [J].
Blumenthal, TD ;
Cuthbert, BN ;
Filion, DL ;
Hackley, S ;
Lipp, OV ;
Van Boxtel, A .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 42 (01) :1-15
[8]   EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009 [J].
Cruccu, G. ;
Sommer, C. ;
Anand, P. ;
Attal, N. ;
Baron, R. ;
Garcia-Larrea, L. ;
Haanpaa, M. ;
Jensen, T. S. ;
Serra, J. ;
Treede, R. -D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2010, 17 (08) :1010-1018
[9]  
de Tommaso M, 2013, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V124, P424, DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.05.025
[10]   A comparative study of cortical responses evoked by transcutaneous electrical vs CO2 laser stimulation [J].
de Tommaso, Marina ;
Santostasi, Roberto ;
Devitofrancesco, Vito ;
Franco, Giovanni ;
Vecchio, Eleonora ;
Delussi, Marianna ;
Livrea, Paolo ;
Katzarava, Zaza .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 122 (12) :2482-2487