Which is a better investment choice in the Hong Kong residential property market: a big or small property?

被引:16
作者
Qiao, Zhuo [1 ]
Wong, Wing-Keung [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macau, Dept Finance & Business Econ, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Econ, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
mean-variance criterion; stochastic dominance; property size; Hong Kong residential property market; STOCHASTIC-DOMINANCE ANALYSIS; REAL-ESTATE; INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS; UTILITY-FUNCTIONS; EXPECTED UTILITY; MONTE-CARLO; TESTS; EFFICIENCY; RISK; STOCKS;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2014.1000534
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The relationship between property size and property investment yield is an interesting issue in the real estate market. Previous studies usually use the mean-variance criterion to compare the return-risk profiles of the yields of different property sizes in the United States. However, this criterion has a few shortcomings. This article provides the first attempt to use a stochastic dominance approach to analyse this issue. We adopt two powerful stochastic dominance tests to compare the yields of five property size classes in the Hong Kong residential property market. In our study, we analyse two possible investment outcomes: (1) investors could not rent out their properties, and thus they would gain/lose from the appreciation/depreciation of residential property prices; (2) investors could also gain from rental incomes. Our empirical results provide strong evidence to show that the yields of smaller property classes stochastically dominate the yields of bigger property classes, suggesting that buying smaller properties is a better investment choice in the Hong Kong residential property market.
引用
收藏
页码:1670 / 1685
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   INTERNATIONAL VALUE VERSUS GROWTH: EVIDENCE FROM STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE ANALYSIS [J].
Abhyankar, Abhay ;
Ho, Keng-Yu ;
Zhao, Huainan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2009, 14 (03) :222-232
[2]   Nonparametric tests of stochastic dominance in income distributions [J].
Anderson, G .
ECONOMETRICA, 1996, 64 (05) :1183-1193
[3]   Consistent tests for stochastic dominance [J].
Barrett, GF ;
Donald, SG .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (01) :71-104
[4]  
Beach M., 1983, REV ECON STUD, V50, P723, DOI [10.2307/2297772, DOI 10.2307/2297772]
[5]  
BISHOP JA, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P262
[6]  
Cho Y-H., 2007, Journal of Empirical Finance, V14, P736, DOI [10.1016/j.jempfin.2007.02.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JEMPFIN.2007.02.001]
[7]   Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality [J].
Davidson, R ;
Duclos, JY .
ECONOMETRICA, 2000, 68 (06) :1435-1464
[8]  
Esrig D, 2011, J PORTFOLIO MANAGE, P125
[9]   MARKET REACTION TO QUARTERLY EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS - A STOCHASTIC-DOMINANCE BASED TEST OF MARKET-EFFICIENCY [J].
FALK, H ;
LEVY, H .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (04) :425-446
[10]   MEAN-VARIANCE ANALYSIS IN THEORY OF LIQUIDITY PREFERENCE AND PORTFOLIO SELECTION [J].
FELDSTEIN, MS .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1969, 36 (01) :5-12