Developing scholarly projects in education: A primer for medical teachers

被引:68
作者
Beckman, Thomas J. [1 ]
Cook, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01421590701291469
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Boyer and Glassick's broad definition of and standards for assessing scholarship apply to all aspects of education. Research on the quality of published medical education studies also reveals fundamentally important elements to address. In this article a three-step approach to developing medical education projects is proposed: refine the scholarly question, identify appropriate designs and methods, and select outcomes. Refining the scholarly question requires careful attention to literature review, conceptual framework, and statements of problem and study intent. The authors emphasize statement of study intent, which is a study's focal point, and conceptual framework, which situates a project within a theoretical context and provides a means for interpreting the results. They then review study designs and methods commonly used in education projects. They conclude with outcomes, which should be distinguished from assessment methods and instruments, and are separated into Kirkpatrick's hierarchy of reaction, learning, behavior and results.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 218
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
American Educational Research Association, 1999, Standards for educational and psychological testing
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ED MEASUREMENT
[3]   Expanding the view of scholarship: Introduction [J].
Beattie, DS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (09) :871-876
[4]   Factor instability of clinical teaching assessment scores among general internists and cardiologists [J].
Beckman, Thomas J. ;
Cook, David A. ;
Mandrekar, Jayawant N. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 40 (12) :1209-1216
[5]   What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching? [J].
Beckman, TJ ;
Cook, DA ;
Mandrekar, JN .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (12) :1159-1164
[6]  
Beckman TJ, 2004, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V292, P2969, DOI 10.1001/jama.292.24.2969-a
[7]   Experimental study design and grant writing in eight steps and 28 questions [J].
Bordage, G ;
Dawson, B .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2003, 37 (04) :376-385
[8]   Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports [J].
Bordage, G .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2001, 76 (09) :889-896
[9]  
Boyer E. L., 1990, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate
[10]  
Campbell D. T., 1963, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research