BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE KINETIC PARAMETERS OF DEGRADATION OF ANTHOCYANINS IN GRAPE POMACE

被引:28
|
作者
Mishra, D. K. [1 ]
Dolan, K. D. [1 ,2 ]
Yang, L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Biosyst & Agr Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Stat & Probabil, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CONDUCTION-HEATED FOODS; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-4530.2009.00425.x
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Because of the growing interest in nutraceuticals and their health benefits, it is important to develop tools for modeling degradation of nutraceuticals in low-moisture-and high-temperature-heated foods. The objective of this study was to estimate the kinetic parameters for the degradation of anthocyanins in grape pomace and to calculate the bootstrap confidence interval (CI), which is a more realistic estimate of the true CI than the commonly used asymptotic CI. Thermal and kinetic parameters for unsteady-state conduction-heated foods (grape pomace) were estimated separately using an inverse problem technique. Rate constant (k(r)) and activation energy (E-a) for the degradation of anthocyanins in grape pomace were estimated, and the 95% bootstrap CIs were calculated and compared with the 95% asymptotic CIs. Grape pomace at 42% moisture content (wet basis) in steel cans (radius 0.027 m, and height 0.073 m) was heated in a steam retort at 126.7C. Anthocyanin retention was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The retention values were used to estimate kinetic parameters, which were k(113.9C) = 0.0606/min and E-a = 65.32 kJ/mol. Asymptotic CIs for k(113.9C) and E-a were 0.052 and 0.068, and 23.3 and 102.7, respectively. Bootstrap 95% CIs for k(113.9C) and E-a were 0.053 and 0.066, and 49.08 and 104.9, respectively. Bootstrap confidence band and bootstrap prediction band (PB) for anthocyanin retention were smaller than asymptotic confidence and PBs, respectively. The smaller width of the bootstrap bands, which are considered more accurate than asymptotic bands, allows more accurate process design and cost-savings, potentially leading to higher-quality nutraceutical products.
引用
收藏
页码:1220 / 1233
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bootstrap confidence intervals and hypothesis tests for extrema of parameters
    Hall, Peter
    Miller, Hugh
    BIOMETRIKA, 2010, 97 (04) : 881 - 892
  • [2] Bootstrap confidence intervals
    DiCiccio, TJ
    Efron, B
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 1996, 11 (03) : 189 - 212
  • [3] Confidence intervals for modeling anthocyanin retention in grape pomace during nonisothermal heating
    Mishra, D. K.
    Dolan, K. D.
    Yang, L.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2008, 73 (01) : E9 - E15
  • [4] BETTER BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS - BALM FOR BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS - COMMENT
    PETERS, SC
    FREEDMAN, DA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 82 (397) : 186 - 187
  • [5] On correct computation of confidence intervals for kinetic parameters
    Francescato, Maria Pia
    Cettolo, Valentina
    Bellio, Ruggero
    PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2019, 7 (14):
  • [6] BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS
    BABU, GJ
    BOSE, A
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 1988, 7 (02) : 151 - 160
  • [7] BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS AND BOOTSTRAP APPROXIMATIONS
    DICICCIO, T
    TIBSHIRANI, R
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 82 (397) : 163 - 170
  • [8] ON THE BOOTSTRAP AND CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS
    HALL, P
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1986, 14 (04): : 1431 - 1452
  • [9] Bootstrap Confidence Intervals: Comment
    Lee, S. M. S.
    Young, G. A.
    Statistical Science, 11 (03):
  • [10] Bootstrap confidence intervals in DirectLiNGAM
    Thamvitayakul, Kittitat
    Shimizu, Shohei
    Ueno, Tsuyoshi
    Washio, Takashi
    Tashiro, Tatsuya
    12TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOPS (ICDMW 2012), 2012, : 659 - 668