Spatiotemporal spread of grapevine red blotch-associated virus in a California vineyard

被引:41
作者
Cieniewicz, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
Pethybridge, Sarah J. [1 ]
Gorny, Adrienne [1 ]
Madden, Laurence V. [2 ]
McLane, Heather [3 ]
Perry, Keith L. [3 ]
Fuchs, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sch Integrat Plant Sci, Sect Plant Pathol & Plant Microbe Biol, New York State Agr Expt Stn, Geneva, NY 14456 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Ohio Agr Res & Dev Ctr, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Sect Plant Pathol & Plant Microbe Biol, Sch Integrat Plant Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Grapevine red blotch-associated virus; Vitis vinifera; Epidemic; Spread; Spatiotemporal modeling; STOCHASTIC-MODELS; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; PLANT EPIDEMIOLOGY; DISTANCE INDEXES; FANLEAF-VIRUS; TRANSMISSION; LEAFROLL; PATTERNS; INDUSTRY; THREAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.virusres.2017.03.020
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Grapevine red blotch-associated virus (GRBaV), the causative agent of red blotch disease, is a member of the genus Grablovirus, in the family Geminiviridae and the first known geminivirus of Vitis spp. Limited information is available on the epidemiology of red blotch disease. A 2-hectare Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet franc' vineyard in Napa County, California, USA was selected for monitoring GRBaV spread over a three-year period (2014-2016) based on an initially low disease incidence and an aggregation of symptomatic vines at the edge of the vineyard proximal to a wooded riparian area. The incidence of diseased plants increased by 1-2% annually. Spatial analysis of diseased plants in each year using ordinary runs analysis within rows and Spatial Analysis by Distance IndicEs (SADIE) demonstrated aggregation. Spatiotemporal analysis between consecutive years within the association function of SADIE revealed a strong overall association among all three years (X = 0.874-0.945). Analysis of epidemic spread fitting a stochastic spatiotemporal model using the Monte Carlo Markov Chain method identified strong evidence for localized (within vineyard) spread. A spatial pattern consisting of a combination of strongly aggregated and randomly isolated symptomatic vines within 8-years post-planting suggested unique epidemic attributes compared to those of other grapevine viruses vectored by mealybugs and soft scales or by dagger nematodes for which typical within-row spread and small-scale autocorrelation are well documented. These findings are consistent with the existence of a new type of vector for a grapevine virus.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 162
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]  
Reynard J. S., 2015, Proceedings, 18th Congress of the International Council for the Study of Virus and Virus-Like Diseases of the Grapevine (ICVG), 7-11 September 2015, Ankara, Turkey, P223
[32]  
Reynard J. S., 2016, RED BLOTCH VIRUS EUR
[33]   Mitigating the Economic Impact of Grapevine Red Blotch: Optimizing Disease Management Strategies in US Vineyards [J].
Ricketts, Katie D. ;
Gomez, Miguel I. ;
Fuchs, Marc F. ;
Martinson, Timothy E. ;
Smith, Rhonda J. ;
Cooper, Monica L. ;
Moyer, Michelle M. ;
Wise, Alice .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE, 2017, 68 (01) :127-135
[34]  
ROSCIGLIONE B, 1983, VITIS, V22, P331
[35]   Grapevine Red Blotch-Associated Virus, an Emerging Threat to the Grapevine Industry [J].
Sudarshana, Mysore R. ;
Perry, Keith L. ;
Fuchs, Marc F. .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 105 (07) :1026-1032
[36]   Capulavirus and Grablovirus: two new genera in the family Geminiviridae [J].
Varsani, Arvind ;
Roumagnac, Philippe ;
Fuchs, Marc ;
Navas-Castillo, Jesus ;
Moriones, Enrique ;
Idris, Ali ;
Briddon, Rob W. ;
Rivera-Bustamante, Rafael ;
Zerbini, F. Murilo ;
Martin, Darren P. .
ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2017, 162 (06) :1819-1831
[37]   Modelling the dynamic spatio-temporal response of predators to transient prey patches in the field [J].
Winder, L ;
Alexander, CJ ;
Holland, JM ;
Woolley, C ;
Perry, JN .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 4 (06) :568-576
[38]   Interrelationships among SADIE indices for characterizing spatial patterns of organisms [J].
Xu, XM ;
Madden, LV .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 95 (08) :874-883