Family medicine practice performance and knowledge management

被引:25
作者
Orzano, A. John [1 ,2 ]
McInerney, Claire R. [1 ,3 ]
Tallia, Alfred F. [1 ,2 ]
Scharf, Davida [3 ]
Crabtree, Benjamin F. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Family Med, Div Res, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Somerset, NJ USA
[2] Canc Inst New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Commun Informat & Lib Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[4] Ctr Res Family Med & Primary Care, New Brunswick, NJ USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
family practice; knowledge management; practice management; quality care;
D O I
10.1097/01.HMR.0000304489.65028.75
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Knowledge management (KM) is the process by which people in organizations find, share, and develop knowledge for action. KM affects performance by influencing work relationships to enhance learning and decision making. Purpose: To identify how family medicine practices exhibit KM. Methodology: A model and a template of KM concepts were derived from a comprehensive organizational literature review. Two higher and two lower performing family medicine practices were purposefully selected from existing comparative case studies based on prevention delivery rates and innovation. Interviews, fieldnotes of operations, and clinical encounters were coded independently using the template. Face-to-face discussions resolved coding differences. Findings: All practices had processes and tools for finding, sharing, and developing knowledge; however, KM overall was limited despite implementation of expensive technologies like an electronic medical record. Where present, KM processes and tools were used by individuals but not integrated throughout the organization. Loss of information was prominent, and finding knowledge was underdeveloped. The use of technical tools and developing knowledge by reconfiguration and measurement were particularly limited. Socially related tools, such as face-to-face-communication for sharing and developing knowledge, were more developed. As in other organizations, tool use was tailored for specific outcomers and leveraged by other organizational capacities. Practice Implications: Differences in KM occur within family practices and between family practices and other organizations and may have implications for improving practice performance. Understanding interaction patterns of work relationships and KM may explain why costly technical or externally imposed "one size fits all" practice organizational interventions have had mixed results and limited sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Addison R.B., 1999, Doing qualitative research, P145
[2]   Knowledge Management: Hype, hope, or help? [J].
Blair, DC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 53 (12) :1019-1028
[3]  
Brown JS, 2000, HARVARD BUS REV, V78, P73
[4]   A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice [J].
Cohen, D ;
McDaniel, RR ;
Crabtree, BF ;
Ruhe, MC ;
Weyer, SM ;
Tallia, A ;
Miller, WL ;
Goodwin, MA ;
Nutting, P ;
Solberg, LI ;
Zyzanski, SJ ;
Jaén, CR ;
Gilchrist, V ;
Stange, KC .
JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 49 (03) :155-168
[5]   Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing [J].
Cook, SDN ;
Brown, JS .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (04) :381-400
[6]  
Crabtree B.F., 1999, DOING QUALITATIVE RE, P163, DOI DOI 10.1046/J.0966-0429.2001.00289.X
[7]   Delivery of clinical preventive services in family medicine offices [J].
Crabtree, BF ;
Miller, WL ;
Tallia, AF ;
Coben, DJ ;
DiCicco-Bloom, B ;
McIlvain, HE ;
Aita, VA ;
Scott, JG ;
Gregory, PB ;
Stange, KC ;
McDaniel, RR .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2005, 3 (05) :430-435
[8]   An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution [J].
Crossan, MM ;
Lane, HW ;
White, RE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (03) :522-537
[9]  
Davenport E, 2003, P ASIST ANNU, V40, P101
[10]  
Davenport T.H., 1998, Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know