Effect of different phenylephrine bolus doses for treatment of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective caesarean section

被引:27
作者
Mohta, M. [1 ,2 ]
Harisinghani, R. [1 ,2 ]
Sethi, A. K. [1 ,2 ]
Agarwal, D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Delhi 110095, India
[2] Guru Teg Bahadur Hosp, Delhi 110095, India
关键词
vasopressor; phenylephrine; elective caesarean section; hypotension; post-spinal hypotension; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; DELIVERY; EPHEDRINE; PREVENTION; INFUSION;
D O I
10.1177/0310057X1504300111
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The efficacy of phenylephrine might be improved by giving doses higher than that traditionally used (100 mu g). This study compared the effects of three initial bolus doses of intravenous phenylephrine; 100 mu g (group P100), 125 mu g (group P125) and 150 mu g (group P150), for the treatment of post-spinal hypotension in patients undergoing elective caesarean delivery. If hypotension was not corrected by this dose, additional boluses of 25 mu g were given every minute. Further hypotensive episodes were treated with half the initial bolus dose, followed by 25 mu g boluses, as required. Umbilical arterial and venous blood samples were obtained for blood gas analysis and Apgar scores recorded. One hundred and twenty subjects (40 per group) who developed post-spinal hypotension (75%) were included in this randomised, double blind trial. Although systolic blood pressure was higher at certain time-points after 150 mu g phenylephrine, there were no statistically significant differences in the effectiveness of the first bolus of phenylephrine to treat hypotension (85%, 95% and 95% in groups P100, P125 and P150, respectively, P=0.215); the additional dose of phenylephrine after the first bolus (P=0.810); the number of additional boluses (P=0.318) or of hypotensive episodes (P=0.118). There were no significant differences in the number of patients developing reactive hypertension or bradycardia, in maternal side-effects or in neonatal outcomes. Although the study may have been underpowered, initial phenylephrine bolus doses of 100 mu g, 125 mu g and 150 mu g did not significantly differ in efficacy to treat post-spinal hypotension in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Four Fixed Rate Infusion Regimens of Phenylephrine for Hemodynamic Support During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery [J].
Allen, Terrence K. ;
George, Ronald B. ;
White, William D. ;
Muir, Holly A. ;
Habib, Ashraf S. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (05) :1221-1229
[2]  
Armstrong L, 2007, ARCH DIS CHILD-FETAL, V92, P430
[3]   PREVENTION OF SPINAL HYPOTENSION ASSOCIATED WITH CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
CLARK, RB ;
THOMPSON, DS ;
THOMPSON, CH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1976, 45 (06) :670-674
[4]   Spinal Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Delivery: Closer to a Solution [J].
Dyer, Robert A. ;
Reed, Anthony R. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (05) :1093-1095
[5]   Up-Down Determination of the 90% Effective Dose of Phenylephrine for the Treatment of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery [J].
George, Ronald B. ;
McKeen, Dolores ;
Columb, Malachy O. ;
Habib, Ashraf S. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 110 (01) :154-158
[6]  
GOERTZ AW, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P541
[7]   A Review of the Impact of Phenylephrine Administration on Maternal Hemodynamics and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia [J].
Habib, Ashraf S. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 114 (02) :377-390
[8]   SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - COMPARISON OF INFUSIONS OF PHENYLEPHRINE AND EPHEDRINE [J].
HALL, PA ;
BENNETT, A ;
WILKES, MP ;
LEWIS, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 73 (04) :471-474
[9]  
KANG YG, 1982, ANESTH ANALG, V61, P839
[10]   Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery - An effective technique using combination phenylephrine infusion and crystalloid cohydration [J].
Kee, WDN ;
Khaw, KS ;
Ng, FF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 103 (04) :744-750