Fertility preservation in children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer: Quality of clinical practice guidelines and variations in recommendations

被引:42
作者
Font-Gonzalez, Anna [1 ]
Mulder, Renee L. [1 ]
Loeffen, Erik A. H. [2 ]
Byrne, Julianne [3 ]
van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline [4 ]
van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M. [5 ]
Hudson, Melissa M. [6 ]
Kenney, Lisa B. [7 ,8 ]
Levine, Jennifer M. [9 ]
Tissing, Wim J. E. [2 ]
van de Wetering, Marianne D. [1 ]
Kremer, Leontien C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emma Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Oncol, Acad Med Ctr, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Beatrix Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Oncol Hematol, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Boyne Res Inst, Drogheda, Ireland
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Pediat Oncol Hematol, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Princess Maxima Ctr Pediat Oncol, Dept Pediat Oncol Hematol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Pediat Oncol, 332 N Lauderdale St, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA USA
[9] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Div Pediat Hematol Oncol & Stem Cell Transplantat, New York, NY USA
关键词
childhood cancer; evidence-based medicine; fertility preservation; guidelines; pediatric oncology; CHILDHOOD-CANCER; FEMALE SURVIVORS; BREAST-CANCER; ONCOLOGY; ISSUES; SURVEILLANCE; MANAGEMENT; CONSENSUS; SOCIETY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.30047
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDFertility preservation care for children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYAs) with cancer is not uniform among practitioners. To ensure high-quality care, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are essential. The authors identified existing CPGs for fertility preservation in CAYAs with cancer, evaluated their quality, and explored differences in recommendations. METHODSA systematic search in PubMed (January 2000-October 2014); guideline databases; and Web sites of oncology, pediatric, and fertility organizations was performed. Two reviewers evaluated the quality of the identified CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrument (AGREE II). From high-quality CPGs, the authors evaluated concordant and discordant areas among the recommendations. RESULTSA total of 25 CPGs regarding fertility preservation were identified. The average AGREE II domain scores (scale of 0%-100%) varied from 15% on applicability to 100% on clarity of presentation. The authors considered 8 CPGs (32%) to be of high quality, which was defined as scores 60% in any 4 domains. Large variations in the recommendations of the high-quality CPGs were observed, with 87.2% and 88.6%, respectively, of discordant guideline areas among the fertility preservation recommendations for female and male patients with cancer. CONCLUSIONSOnly approximately one-third of the identified CPGs were found to be of sufficient quality. Of these CPGs, the fertility preservation recommendations varied substantially, which can be a reflection of inadequate evidence for specific recommendations, thereby hindering the ability of providers to deliver high-quality care. CPGs including a transparent decision process for fertility preservation can help health care providers to deliver optimal and uniform care, thus improving the quality of life of CAYAs with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 2016;122:2216-23. (c) 2016 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. Only approximately one-third of the identified clinical practice guidelines for fertility preservation in children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer were found to be of sufficient quality, and among these, the recommendations varied substantially. This finding supports the need for well-developed and transparent harmonized clinical practice guidelines for children and young adults diagnosed with cancer who are at risk of fertility impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:2216 / 2223
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Alberta Provincial Gynecologic Oncology Tumour Team, 2013, OV GERM CELL TUM
  • [2] Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline
    不详
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, GUID CRYOPR OV TISS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL, DOI DOI 10.17226/13058
  • [5] Recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group
    Armenian, Saro H.
    Hudson, Melissa M.
    Mulder, Renee L.
    Chen, Ming Hui
    Constine, Louis S.
    Dwyer, Mary
    Nathan, Paul C.
    Tissing, Wim J. E.
    Shankar, Sadhna
    Sieswerda, Elske
    Skinner, Rod
    Steinberger, Julia
    van Dalen, Elvira C.
    van der Pal, Helena
    Wallace, W. Hamish
    Levitt, Gill
    Kremer, Leontien C. M.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (03) : E123 - E136
  • [6] Backhus Leilah E., 2007, V138, P235
  • [7] Infertility, infertility treatment, and achievement of pregnancy in female survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort
    Barton, Sara E.
    Najita, Julie S.
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.
    Leisenring, Wendy M.
    Stovall, Marilyn
    Weathers, Rita E.
    Sklar, Charles A.
    Robison, Leslie L.
    Diller, Lisa
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (09) : 873 - 881
  • [8] Bero LA, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P465
  • [9] Quality of evidence-based pediatric guidelines
    Boluyt, N
    Lincke, CR
    Offringa, M
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2005, 115 (05) : 1378 - 1391
  • [10] AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care
    Brouwers, Melissa C.
    Kho, Michelle E.
    Browman, George P.
    Burgers, Jako S.
    Cluzeau, Francoise
    Feder, Gene
    Fervers, Beatrice
    Graham, Ian D.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy
    Hanna, Steven E.
    Littlejohns, Peter
    Makarski, Julie
    Zitzelsberger, Louise
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (18) : E839 - E842