Guided bone regeneration for dehiscence and fenestration defects on implants using an absorbable polymer barrier

被引:27
作者
Rosen, PS
Reynolds, MA
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Baltimore Coll Dent Surg, Dept Periodont, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Baltimore Coll Dent Surg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] WL Gore & Assoc Inc, Gore Tex, Flagstaff, AZ USA
[4] Atrisorb, Block Drug, Jersey City, NJ USA
关键词
guided bone regeneration; grafts; bone; membranes; barrier; bioabsorbable; polylactic acid; therapeutic use; follow-up studies;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.250
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a non-absorbable barrier has provided clinicians the ability to place implants in sites compromised by insufficient bone, including immediate extraction sites. Recent evidence suggests that successful GBR outcomes may be possible using bioabsorbable polymer barriers. Methods: This report presents a case series of 9 patients with 8 fenestration and 3 dehiscence defects on implants consecutively treated with GBR. A bioabsorbable polymer-barrier of poly(DL-lactide) was used in conjunction with a composite graft of freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA)/demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) mixed in a ratio of 1:1. Second-stage surgeries were performed at 4 to 8.5 months (5.7 months average) post-placement. Biopsy material from 2 sites was obtained while exposing the implant for healing abutment connection. Results: Ten of the 11 defects (90.9%) achieved complete coverage of the osseous defects. Histologic evaluations revealed the formation of viable bone, frequently in close amalgamation with residual graft particles. Conclusion: These case reports suggest that a poly(DL-lactide) polymer can be used as a physical barrier with a composite bone replacement graft to achieve successful GBR results of dehiscence/fenestration defects when placing implants.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 256
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Andersson B, 1993, Clin Oral Implants Res, V4, P90, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040205.x
  • [2] ASHMAN A, 1990, Journal of Oral Implantology, V16, P28
  • [3] Augthun M, 1995, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V10, P421
  • [4] Becher, 1994, INT J PERIODONT REST, V14, P49
  • [5] Becker W, 1994, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V9, P31
  • [6] Becker W, 1990, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, V10, P376
  • [7] GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION FOR IMPLANTS PLACED INTO EXTRACTION SOCKETS - A STUDY IN DOGS
    BECKER, W
    BECKER, BE
    HANDELSMAN, M
    OCHSENBEIN, C
    ALBREKTSSON, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1991, 62 (11) : 703 - 709
  • [8] Becker W, 1990, INT J PERIODONT REST, V10, P93
  • [9] PLACEMENT OF ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS INTO TOOTH EXTRACTION SITES
    BLOCK, MS
    KENT, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1991, 49 (12) : 1269 - 1276
  • [10] Botz ML, 1997, J DENT RES, V76, P3375