Perspective taking can promote short-term inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees

被引:120
作者
Adida, Claire L. [1 ]
Lo, Adeline [2 ]
Platas, Melina R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Polit Sci, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Polit, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[3] New York Univ Abu Dhabi, Div Social Sci, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
refugees; immigration; exclusion; empathy; perspective taking; FIELD EXPERIMENT; VOTER TURNOUT; PREJUDICE; ATTITUDES; TRIGGERS; CONTACT; EMPATHY;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1804002115
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Social scientists have shown how easily individuals are moved to exclude outgroup members. Can we foster inclusion instead? This study leverages one of the most significant humanitarian crises of our time to test whether, and under what conditions, American citizens adopt more inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees. We conduct a nationally representative survey of over 5,000 American citizens in the weeks leading up to the 2016 presidential election and experimentally test whether a perspective-taking exercise increases inclusionary behavior in the form of an anonymous letter supportive of refugees to be sent to the 45th President of the United States. Our results indicate that the perspective-taking message increases the likelihood of writing such a positive letter by two to five percentage points. By contrast, an informational message had no significant effect on letter writing. The effect of the perspective-taking exercise occurs in the short run only, manifests as a behavioral rather than an attitudinal response, and is strongest among Democrats. However, this effect also appears in the subset of Republican respondents, suggesting that efforts to promote perspective taking may move to action a wide cross-section of individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:9521 / 9526
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Explaining Preferences from Behavior: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach [J].
Acharya, Avidit ;
Blackwell, Matthew ;
Sen, Maya .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2018, 80 (02) :400-411
[2]   Explaining Causal Findings Without Bias: Detecting and Assessing Direct Effects [J].
Acharya, Avidit ;
Blackwell, Matthew ;
Sen, Maya .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2016, 110 (03) :512-529
[3]  
Adida ClaireL., 2016, Why Muslim Integration Fails in Christian-Heritage Societies
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EVERYBODY MATTERS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, AM VIEW IMMIGRANTS M
[6]  
[Anonymous], AM AGAIN OPPOSED TAK
[7]   How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers [J].
Bansak, Kirk ;
Hainmueller, Jens ;
Hangartner, Dominik .
SCIENCE, 2016, 354 (6309) :217-222
[8]   What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat [J].
Brader, Ted ;
Valentino, Nicholas A. ;
Suhay, Elizabeth .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 52 (04) :959-978
[9]   Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing [J].
Broockman, David ;
Kalla, Joshua .
SCIENCE, 2016, 352 (6282) :220-224
[10]   The power of being heard: The benefits of 'perspective-giving' in the context of intergroup conflict [J].
Bruneau, Emile G. ;
Saxe, Rebecca .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 48 (04) :855-866