Effects of Confounding Bias in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Test-Negative Designs Due to Correlated Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccination Behaviors

被引:62
|
作者
Doll, Margaret K. [1 ]
Pettigrew, Stacy M. [1 ]
Ma, Julia [2 ]
Verma, Aman [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Albany Coll Pharm & Hlth Sci, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Precis Analyt, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
test; negative; vaccine effectiveness; COVID-19; influenza; SARS-CoV-2; VARIANT PREDOMINANCE; SELECTION; DELTA;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciac234
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Correlated influenza and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination behaviors can bias influenza and COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates from test-negative studies. Bias depends upon the proportion of controls with the other vaccine-preventable disease, correlation between vaccines, and true VE of both vaccines. Background The test-negative design is commonly used to estimate influenza and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness (VE). In these studies, correlated COVID-19 and influenza vaccine behaviors may introduce a confounding bias where controls are included with the other vaccine-preventable acute respiratory illness (ARI). We quantified the impact of this bias on VE estimates in studies where this bias is not addressed. Methods We simulated study populations under varying vaccination probabilities, COVID-19 VE, influenza VE, and proportions of controls included with the other vaccine-preventable ARI. Mean bias was calculated as the difference between estimated and true VE. Absolute mean bias in VE estimates was classified as low (<10%), moderate (10% to <20%), and high (>= 20%). Results Where vaccination probabilities are positively correlated, COVID-19 and influenza VE test-negative studies with influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ARI controls, respectively, underestimate VE. For COVID-19 VE studies, mean bias was low for all scenarios where influenza represented <= 25% of controls. For influenza VE studies, mean bias was low for all scenarios where SARS-CoV-2 represented <= 10% of controls. Although bias was driven by the conditional probability of vaccination, low VE of the vaccine of interest and high VE of the confounding vaccine increase its magnitude. Conclusions Where a low percentage of controls is included with the other vaccine-preventable ARI, bias in COVID-19 and influenza VE estimates is low. However, influenza VE estimates are likely more susceptible to bias. Researchers should consider potential bias and its implications in their respective study settings to make informed methodological decisions in test-negative VE studies.
引用
收藏
页码:E564 / E571
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Characteristic CT findings distinguishing 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) from influenza pneumonia
    Wang, Hao
    Wei, Ran
    Rao, Guihua
    Zhu, Jie
    Song, Bin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (09) : 4910 - 4917
  • [42] Attitudes of Healthcare Workers toward Influenza Vaccination in the COVID-19 Era
    Sani, Tommaso
    Morelli, Ilaria
    Sarti, Donatella
    Tassinari, Giovanni
    Capalbo, Maria
    Espinosa, Emma
    Gasperini, Beatrice
    Prospero, Emilia
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [43] Vaccination of older adults: Influenza, pneumococcal disease, herpes zoster, COVID-19 and beyond
    Birgit Weinberger
    Immunity & Ageing, 18
  • [44] Predicting COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination Confidence and Uptake in the United States
    Shen, Lijiang
    Lee, Daniel
    VACCINES, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [45] A Case–Control Study of the 2019 Influenza Vaccine and Incidence of COVID-19 Among Healthcare Workers
    Nilofar Massoudi
    Babak Mohit
    Journal of Clinical Immunology, 2021, 41 : 324 - 334
  • [46] COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies in the Endemic Period: Lessons from Influenza
    Nham, Eliel
    Noh, Ji Yun
    Park, Ok
    Choi, Won Suk
    Song, Joon Young
    Cheong, Hee Jin
    Kim, Woo Joo
    VACCINES, 2024, 12 (05)
  • [47] The Impact of Vaccination on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreaks in the United States
    Moghadas, Seyed M.
    Vilches, Thomas N.
    Zhang, Kevin
    Wells, Chad R.
    Shoukat, Affan
    Singer, Burton H.
    Meyers, Lauren Ancel
    Neuzil, Kathleen M.
    Langley, Joanne M.
    Fitzpatrick, Meagan C.
    Galvani, Alison P.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 73 (12) : 2257 - 2264
  • [48] Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination uptake among healthcare workers
    Gilboa, Mayan
    Tal, Ilana
    Levin, Einav G.
    Segal, Shoshi
    Belkin, Ana
    Zilberman-Daniels, Tal
    Biber, Asaf
    Rubin, Carmit
    Rahav, Galia
    Regev-Yochay, Gili
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 43 (10) : 1433 - 1438
  • [49] Trends in COVID-19 and influenza vaccine ordering and distribution in Massachusetts jails
    Cassarino, Nicole
    Ahnger-Pier, Kathryn K.
    Wurcel, Alysse
    VACCINE, 2023, 41 (44) : 6607 - 6611
  • [50] COVID-19 and influenza vaccine Hesitancy among adults hospitalized in the United 2019-2022
    Khan, Akram
    Zhu, Yuwei
    Babcock, Hilary M.
    Busse, Laurence W.
    Duggal, Abhijit
    Exline, Matthew C.
    Gaglani, Manjusha
    Gibbs, Kevin W.
    Gong, Michelle N.
    Ginde, Adit A.
    Hager, David N.
    Hope, Aluko A.
    Hyde, Jessica
    Johnson, Nicholas J.
    Kwon, Jennie H.
    Mohr, Nicholas M.
    O'Rourke, Mary
    Peltan, Ithan D.
    Mallow, Christopher
    Qadir, Nida
    Reddy, Raju
    Safdar, Basmah
    Shapiro, Nathan I.
    Sohn, Ine
    Steingrub, Jay S.
    Wilson, Jennifer G.
    Baughman, Adrienne
    Womack, Kelsey N.
    Rhoads, Jillian P.
    Self, Wesley H.
    Stubblefield, William B.
    VACCINE, 2025, 48