Comparison of ground-based FTIR and Brewer O3 total column with data from two different IASI algorithms and from OMI and GOME-2 satellite instruments

被引:39
|
作者
Viatte, C. [1 ]
Schneider, M. [2 ,3 ]
Redondas, A. [3 ]
Hase, F. [2 ]
Eremenko, M. [1 ]
Chelin, P. [1 ]
Flaud, J. -M. [1 ]
Blumenstock, T. [2 ]
Orphal, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Est Creteil, LISA, CNRS,Inst Pierre Simon Laplace, UMR 7583, F-94010 Creteil, France
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Meteorol & Climate Res IMK, Karlsruhe, Germany
[3] Ctr Invest Atmosfer Izana, Agencia Estatal Meteorol AEMET, Izana, Spain
关键词
ATMOSPHERIC SOUNDING INTERFEROMETER; ABSORPTION CROSS-SECTIONS; CHEMICAL-TRANSPORT MODEL; OZONE UV SPECTROSCOPY; TROPOSPHERIC OZONE; HIGH-RESOLUTION; VALIDATION; PROFILES; SPECTRA; MOZART;
D O I
10.5194/amt-4-535-2011
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
An intercomparison of ozone total column measurements derived from various platforms is presented in this work. Satellite data from Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI), Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME-2) are compared with data from two ground-based spectrometers (Fourier Transform Infrared spectrometer FTIR and Brewer), located at the Network for Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) super-site of Izana (Tenerife), measured during a campaign from March to June 2009. These ground-based observing systems have already been demonstrated to perform consistent, precise and accurate ozone total column measurements. An excellent agreement between ground-based and OMI/GOME-2 data is observed. Results from two different algorithms for deriving IASI ozone total column are also compared: the European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMET-SAT/ESA) operational algorithm and the LISA (Laboratoire Inter-universitaire des Systemes Atmospheriques) algorithm. A better agreement was found with LISA's analytical approach based on an altitude-dependent Tikhonov-Philips regularization: correlations are 0.94 and 0.89 compared to FTIR and Brewer, respectively; while the operational IASI ozone columns (based on neural network analysis) show correlations of 0.90 and 0.85, respectively, compared to the O-3 columns obtained from FTIR and Brewer.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 546
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Comparison of ground-based Brewer and FTIR total column O3 monitoring techniques
    Schneider, M.
    Redondas, A.
    Hase, F.
    Guirado, C.
    Blumenstock, T.
    Cuevas, E.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (18) : 5535 - 5550
  • [2] Validation of the IASI FORLI/EUMETSAT ozone products using satellite (GOME-2), ground-based (Brewer-Dobson, SAOZ, FTIR) and ozonesonde measurements
    Boynard, Anne
    Hurtmans, Daniel
    Garane, Katerina
    Goutail, Florence
    Hadji-Lazaro, Juliette
    Koukouli, Maria Elissavet
    Wespes, Catherine
    Vigouroux, Corinne
    Keppens, Arno
    Pommereau, Jean-Pierre
    Pazmino, Andrea
    Balis, Dimitris
    Loyola, Diego
    Valks, Pieter
    Sussmann, Ralf
    Smale, Dan
    Coheur, Pierre-Francois
    Clerbaux, Cathy
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2018, 11 (09) : 5125 - 5152
  • [3] Ground-based FTIR observations of CH4 total column at Tomsk in comparison with IASI satellite data
    Serdyukov, V., I
    Makarova, M., V
    Gridnev, Yu, V
    Voronin, B. A.
    Petrov, D., V
    Shcherbakov, A. P.
    Sinitsa, L. N.
    26TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEAN OPTICS, ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2020, 11560
  • [4] Validation of the MetOp-A total ozone data from GOME-2 and IASI using reference ground-based measurements at the Iberian Peninsula
    Anton, M.
    Loyola, D.
    Clerbaux, C.
    Lopez, M.
    Vilaplana, J. M.
    Banon, M.
    Hadji-Lazaro, J.
    Valks, P.
    Hao, N.
    Zimmer, W.
    Coheur, P. F.
    Hurtmans, D.
    Alados-Arboledas, L.
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (06) : 1380 - 1386
  • [5] Volcanic SO2 fluxes derived from satellite data: a survey using OMI, GOME-2, IASI and MODIS
    Theys, N.
    Campion, R.
    Clarisse, L.
    Brenot, H.
    van Gent, J.
    Dils, B.
    Corradini, S.
    Merucci, L.
    Coheur, P. -F.
    Van Roozendael, M.
    Hurtmans, D.
    Clerbaux, C.
    Tait, S.
    Ferrucci, F.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2013, 13 (12) : 5945 - 5968
  • [6] Comparison of GOME-2 UVA Satellite Data to Ground-Based Spectroradiometer Measurements at a Subtropical Site
    Parisi, Alfio V.
    Downs, Nathan
    Turner, Joanna
    King, Rachel
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 55 (06): : 3145 - 3149
  • [7] Comparison of GOME-2 UVA Satellite Data to Ground-Based UVA Measurements in South Africa
    du Preez, D. Jean
    Parisi, Alfio, V
    Millar, Danielle A.
    Bencherif, Hassan
    Wright, Caradee Y.
    PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 2020, 96 (06) : 1342 - 1349
  • [8] Three years of ground-based total ozone measurements in the Arctic: Comparison with OMI, GOME and SCIAMACHY satellite data
    Damiani, A.
    De Simone, S.
    Rafanelli, C.
    Cordero, R. R.
    Laurenza, M.
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 127 : 162 - 180
  • [9] Comparison of total water vapor column from GOME-2 on MetOp-A against ground-based GPS measurements at the Iberian Peninsula
    Roman, R.
    Anton, M.
    Cachorro, V. E.
    Loyola, D.
    Ortiz de Galisteo, J. P.
    de Frutos, A.
    Romero-Campos, P. M.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 533 : 317 - 328
  • [10] Comparison of total column ozone obtained by the IASI-MetOp satellite with ground-based and OMI satellite observations in the southern tropics and subtropics
    Toihir, A. M.
    Bencherif, H.
    Sivakumar, V.
    El Amraoui, L.
    Portafaix, T.
    Mbatha, N.
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2015, 33 (09) : 1135 - 1146