Who partners up? Homogamy and income inequality in New Zealand cities

被引:0
作者
Alimi, Omoniyi B. [1 ]
Mare, David C. [2 ]
Poot, Jacques [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waikato, Sch Accounting Finance & Econ, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
[2] Motu Econ & Publ Policy Res, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Univ Waikato, Natl Inst Demog & Econ Anal, Hamilton, New Zealand
[4] Vrije Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Spatial Econ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
education; homogamy; inequality; New Zealand; urban areas; KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS; EARNINGS INEQUALITY; MARKET; WAGE; COUPLES; CHOICE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1111/jors.12558
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the impact of homogamy on the distribution of household income in New Zealand at the national level and across different sized cities. We focus on homogamy by age, education, hours worked, employment status, and migration status. We present a new index of homogamy that takes account of maximum potential homogamy. Our index is less sensitive to categories with small population shares than the commonly used concentration ratios. We compare the inequality impact of actual matching with that of randomized matching by means of the additional randomization method. Contrary to public perception, homogamy of the highly educated has declined relative to random matching. Nonetheless, homogamy has had an inequality-increasing impact on the distribution of income and this effect has grown over time: from around 5% of the mean log deviation (MLD) measure of income inequality in 1986 to 16% in 2013. Allowing for simulated labor supply responses reduces this effect by less than 1%. Spatially, the effect of homogamy is larger and increases more in metropolitan areas than in other urban areas. In Auckland, New Zealand's largest city (around a third of the population), homogamy accounted for a fifth of MLD inequality by 2013, up from 6% in 1986. Educational homogamy plays the biggest role in this process, but the effects of hours worked, employment status and migration status are relatively important too. Homogamy by age has little effect on income inequality. Using the Gini index as an alternative inequality measure yields similar results.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 193
页数:23
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Alimi O., 2018, 11959 IZA DP
  • [2] Alimi O. B., 2016, REBOOTING REGIONS WH, P177
  • [3] Alimi OB, 2018, ADV SPAT SCI, P133, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68563-2_8
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, Household incomes in New Zealand: Trends in indicators of inequality and hardship 1982 to 2018
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, Growing Unequal. Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries
  • [6] The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration
    Autor, DH
    Levy, F
    Murnane, RJ
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (04) : 1279 - 1333
  • [7] Ball C., 2016, NEW ZEAL ECON PAP, V50, P323
  • [8] Baum S, 2018, AUSTRALAS J REG STUD, V24, P124
  • [9] Why Has Urban Inequality Increased?
    Baum-Snow, Nathaniel
    Freedman, Matthew
    Pavan, Ronni
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 10 (04) : 1 - 42
  • [10] Trade, technology, and the rise of the service sector: The effects on US wage inequality
    Blum, Bemardo S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 74 (02) : 441 - 458