Learning to accelerate globally optimal solutions to the AC Optimal Power Flow problem

被引:11
作者
Cengil, Fatih [2 ]
Nagarajan, Harsha [1 ]
Bent, Russell [1 ]
Eksioglu, Sandra [2 ]
Eksioglu, Burak [2 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Appl Math & Plasma Phys T5, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Ind Engn, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
Optimal power flow; Global optimization; Convex relaxation; Machine learning; Neural network; NONLINEAR PROGRAMS; ALGORITHM; OPTIMIZATION; CONSTRAINTS; RELAXATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108275
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We propose machine learning-based (ML) methods to accelerate convergence to global solutions for the AC Optimal Power Flow (AC-OPF) problem. In particular, for the non-convex AC-OPF problem, optimality-based bound tightening (OBBT) has been observed to be a very effective approach for tightening the variable domains, thus leading to tight convex relaxations that are nearly global optimum solutions. However, by construction, OBBT is computationally expensive even on medium-scaled power networks. To address this issue, we propose a novel ML-based policy to replace the exhaustive algorithm of OBBT by choosing a subset of variables whose tightening of bounds can still contribute to the best improvement of the convex relaxation of the AC-OPF problem. To this end, we leverage historical data of load profiles for a test system to learn a map between the system loading and subset selection of variables which will need to participate in the OBBT algorithm, thus enabling us to find near-global optimal solutions at faster run-times. Finally, we present detailed numerical studies on a few medium-sized benchmark instances, on which we observe up to 6.3x speed-up in OBBT run times.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Joint Chance Constraints in AC Optimal Power Flow: Improving Bounds Through Learning [J].
Baker, Kyri ;
Bernstein, Andrey .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (06) :6376-6385
[2]   Strong NP-hardness of AC power flows feasibility [J].
Bienstock, Daniel ;
Verma, Abhinav .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 47 (06) :494-501
[3]  
Cain Mary B, 2012, FEDERAL ENERGY REGUL
[4]  
Carpentier J., 1962, Bull Fr Soc Electr, V3, P431
[5]   Bound Tightening for the Alternating Current Optimal Power Flow Problem [J].
Chen, Chen ;
Atamturk, Alper ;
Oren, Shmuel S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (05) :3729-3736
[6]  
Coffrin C., 2018, 2018 POWER SYSTEMS C, P1, DOI [DOI 10.23919/PSCC.2018.8442948, 10.23919/PSCC.2018.8442948]
[7]   Strengthening the SDP Relaxation of AC Power Flows With Convex Envelopes, Bound Tightening, and Valid Inequalities [J].
Coffrin, Carleton ;
Hijazi, Hassan L. ;
Van Hentenryck, Pascal .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (05) :3549-3558
[8]   The QC Relaxation: A Theoretical and Computational Study on Optimal Power Flow [J].
Coffrin, Carleton ;
Hijazi, Hassan L. ;
Van Hentenryck, Pascal .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (04) :3008-3018
[9]   Strengthening Convex Relaxations with Bound Tightening for Power Network Optimization [J].
Coffrin, Carleton ;
Hijazi, Hassan L. ;
Van Hentenryck, Pascal .
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CONSTRAINT PROGRAMMING, CP 2015, 2015, 9255 :39-57
[10]  
Deka D., 2019, 2019 IEEE MILAN POWE, P1