Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance

被引:57
作者
Pickering, Jonathan [1 ]
Hickmann, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Backstrand, Karin [4 ]
Kalfagianni, Agni [2 ]
Bloomfield, Michael [5 ]
Mert, Aysem [6 ]
Ransan-Cooper, Hedda [7 ]
Lo, Alex Y. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canberra, Ctr Deliberat Democracy & Global Governance, Canberra Sch Polit Econ & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Lund, Sweden
[4] Stockholm Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Univ Bath, Ctr Dev Studies Dept Social & Policy Sci, Bath, Avon, England
[6] Univ Duisburg Essen, Ctr Global Cooperat Res, Essen, Germany
[7] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, Sch Engn, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Geog Environm & Earth Sci, Wellington, New Zealand
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Earth system governance; Environmental governance; Transformative governance; Sustainability transformations; Environmental democracy; Ecological democracy; NON-STATE ACTORS; CLIMATE; POLICY; POLITICS; SCIENCE; PARTICIPATION; INCLUSIVENESS; TRANSITIONS; SYSTEMS; DELIBERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many democracies find it difficult to act swiftly on problems such as climate change and biodiversity loss. This is reflected in long-standing debates in research and policy about whether democratic practices are capable of fostering timely, large-scale transformations towards sustainability. Drawing on an integrative review of scholarly literature from 2011 to early 2021 on sustainability transformations and the democracy-environment nexus, this article synthesises existing research on prospects and pitfalls for democratising sustainability transformations. We advance a new typology for understanding various combinations of democratic/authoritarian practices and of transformations towards/away from sustainability. We then explore the role of democratic practices in accelerating or obstructing five key dimensions of sustainability transformations: institutional, social, economic, technological, and epistemic. Across all dimensions we find substantial evidence that democratic practices can foster transformations towards sustainability, and we conclude by outlining a set of associated policy recommendations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 200 条
[1]   Democracy in a Global Emergency Five Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Afsahi, Afsoun ;
Beausoleil, Emily ;
Dean, Rikki ;
Ercan, Selen A. ;
Gagnon, Jean-Paul .
DEMOCRATIC THEORY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2020, 7 (02) :V-XIX
[2]  
Allen J.I, 2020, NEW CLIMATE ACTIVISM
[3]   Climate justice and sustained transnational mobilization [J].
Almeida, Paul .
GLOBALIZATIONS, 2019, 16 (07) :973-979
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, THEOR CULT SOC, DOI DOI 10.1177/0263276409361497
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PATTERNS DEMOCRACY G, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.006
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Dauvergne
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, DESIGNS NATURE SCI D
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, GLOB ASS SUMM POL MA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2016, STAYING ALIVE WOMEN
[10]   Another avenue of action: an examination of climate change countermovement industries' use of PAC donations and their relationship to Congressional voting over time [J].
Ard, Kerry ;
Garcia, Nick ;
Kelly, Paige .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2017, 26 (06) :1107-1131