Reverse migration of lithofacies boundaries and shoreline in response to sea-level rise

被引:7
作者
Baumanis, Carolina [1 ]
Kim, Wonsuck [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Geol Sci, Jackson Sch Geosci, 1 Univ Stn C9000, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; BED RIVERS; PART; GRAVEL; FLUME; FRONT;
D O I
10.1111/bre.12209
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The migration of the lithofacies boundaries preserved in the sedimentary record is key to interpreting changes in depositional environments. Grain size is one of the most recognizable physical characteristics of lithofacies. The advance and retreat of grain-size breaks, as a proxy for lithofacies boundaries (e.g. gravel-sand transition), is commonly attributed to variations in external controls (e.g. climate, sea level and tectonic subsidence). While most models of fluviodeltaic systems focus on predicting the response of the shoreline to these forcings, none have thoroughly incorporated the migration of grain-size transitions (GST) that coevolve with the shoreline. We present a numerical delta evolution model that treats both the shoreline and GST as moving boundaries to provide quantitative understanding of the dynamic interaction between the downstream boundary (shoreline) and the upstream lithofacies boundaries (GSTs) of the fluviodeltaic system under relative sea-level rise. We tested a range of relative sea-level rise rates in the model. The shoreline and GST gradually reduced their progradation rates and eventually retreated landward as the fluviodeltaic topset and foreset elongated. However, their timings of retreat were different, resulting in a counterintuitive case for a quicker retreat of GST while the shoreline still continued to advance. A series of scaled flume experiments with a sand and crushed walnut sediment mixture captured the same behaviours of these two moving boundaries. We found that GST experienced higher relative sea-level rise (RSLR) rates than the shoreline. This additional RSLR rate scales with the downstream river slope and the shoreline progradation rate to cause earlier GST retreat in comparison to the shoreline. The fundamental understanding from this study of migration of both the GST and shoreline in fluviodeltaic systems will aid in accurately assessing the trajectories of GST in sedimentary strata as a proxy for environmental change.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 100
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, AAPG METHODS EXPLORA
[2]   Towards the standardization of sequence stratigraphy [J].
Catuneanu, O. ;
Abreub, V. ;
Bhattacharya, J. P. ;
Blum, M. D. ;
Dalrymple, R. W. ;
Eriksson, P. G. ;
Fielding, C. R. ;
Fisher, W. L. ;
Galloway, W. E. ;
Gibling, M. R. ;
Giles, K. A. ;
Holbrook, J. M. ;
Jordan, R. ;
Kendall, C. G. St. C. ;
Macurda, B. ;
Martinsen, O. J. ;
Miall, A. D. ;
Neal, J. E. ;
Nummedal, D. ;
Pomar, L. ;
Posamentier, H. W. ;
Pratt, B. R. ;
Sarg, J. F. ;
Shanley, K. W. ;
Steel, R. J. ;
Strasser, A. ;
Tucker, M. E. ;
Winker, C. .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2009, 92 (1-2) :1-33
[3]   Numerical simulation of aggradation and downstream fining [J].
Cui, YT ;
Parker, G ;
Paola, C .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH, 1996, 34 (02) :185-204
[4]  
Einstein H A., 1950, U.S. dept. agric. Soil Conser. Serv, P1026
[5]  
Engelund F., 1972, MONOGRAPH SEDIMENT T
[6]   Similarity solutions for fluvial sediment fining by selective deposition [J].
Fedele, Juan J. ;
Paola, Chris .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2007, 112 (F2)
[7]   SEDIMENTARY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GRAVEL-SAND TRANSITION IN THE RIVER RHINE [J].
Frings, Roy M. .
JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY RESEARCH, 2011, 81 (1-2) :52-63
[8]  
HellandHansen W, 1996, J SEDIMENT RES, V66, P670
[9]   NUMERICAL-SIMULATION OF DOWNSTREAM FINING BY SELECTIVE TRANSPORT IN GRAVEL-BED RIVERS - MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND ILLUSTRATION [J].
HOEY, TB ;
FERGUSON, R .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1994, 30 (07) :2251-2260
[10]   Experimental measurement of the relative importance of controls on shoreline migration [J].
Kim, W ;
Paola, C ;
Voller, VR ;
Swenson, JB .
JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY RESEARCH, 2006, 76 (1-2) :270-283