The 'New Terrorism': Revolution or Evolution?

被引:16
作者
Field, Antony [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Polit & Int Studies, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1478-9299.2009.00179.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
It is essential to understand the concept of the 'new terrorism', since it has fostered a paradigm shift in the way that academics, policy makers and counter-terrorism professionals conceive of the contemporary threat. Capturing the notion that there has been a revolutionary change in the nature of terrorism, it now plays a pre-eminent role in shaping counter-terrorism policy. However, despite the attractive simplicity of the concept, there are good reasons to question the assumption that the actual behaviour of terrorist groups has fundamentally altered. Indeed, an analysis of the history of terrorism shows that many of the supposed hallmarks of the 'new terrorism' have been seen in the past. As a consequence, the concept of the 'new terrorism' should be viewed with some scepticism, as it unduly exaggerates the unprecedented nature of the contemporary terrorist threat and needlessly leads policy makers to reject the relevance of historical counter-terrorism lessons.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 207
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COMMUNICATION 0305
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Inside Terrorism
[3]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATION 0311
[4]  
[Anonymous], FAR ENEMY WHY JIHAD
[5]  
[Anonymous], TERRORISM POLITICAL
[6]  
Arquilla John., 1999, STUD CONFL TERROR, V22, P193
[7]  
Benjamin D., 2002, AGE SACRED TERROR
[8]  
Brown Gordon, 2006, COMMUNICATION 1010
[9]  
Bush George W., 2001, President Signs Anti-Terrorism Bill
[10]   Catastrophic terrorism - Tackling the new danger [J].
Carter, A ;
Deutch, J ;
Zelikow, P .
FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 1998, 77 (06) :80-+