Markets without Symbolic Limits

被引:46
作者
Brennan, Jason [1 ]
Jaworski, Peter Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Econ Eth & Publ Policy, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/680907
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Semiotic objections to commodification hold that buying and selling certain goods and services is wrong because of what market exchange communicates or because it violates the meaning of certain goods, services, and relationships. We argue that such objections fail. The meaning of markets and of money is a contingent, socially constructed fact. Cultures often impute meaning to markets in harmful, socially destructive, or costly ways. Rather than semiotic objections giving us reason to judge certain markets as immoral, the usefulness of certain markets gives us reason to judge certain semiotic codes as immoral.
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1077
页数:25
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Anderson Elizabeth., 1995, Value in Ethics and Economics, P45
  • [2] Why commercial surrogate motherhood unethically commodifies women and children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales
    Anderson, ES
    [J]. HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2000, 8 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [3] ANDERSON ES, 1990, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V19, P71
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, TELEGRAPH
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, MORALITY MARKETS ETH, P64
  • [6] [Anonymous], WHY SOME THINGS SHOU
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2003, BBC NEWS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2007, PURCHASE INTIMACY
  • [9] Archard David, 1999, J ETHICS, V6, P87
  • [10] Barber Benjamin, 2008, CONSUMED, P39