Association of Immunosuppressive Maintenance Regimens With Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Kidney Transplant Recipients

被引:63
作者
Sampaio, Marcelo Santos [1 ]
Cho, Yong W. [1 ]
Shah, Tariq [1 ,2 ]
Bunnapradist, Suphamai [3 ]
Hutchinson, Ian V. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mendez Natl Inst Transplantat, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] St Vincents Med Ctr, Kidney Transplant Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Kidney Transplant Program, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Sch Pharm, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Kidney transplant; Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder; Epstein-Barr virus; UNOS; Immunosuppressive drugs; EPSTEIN-BARR-VIRUS; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; UNITED-STATES; RAPAMYCIN IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; RISK-FACTORS; SIROLIMUS; MALIGNANCY; GROWTH; TACROLIMUS;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e31823ae7db
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The association of immunosuppressive regimens (ISRs) with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) may be related with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) recipient serostatus. Methods. We selected primary kidney transplant recipients from Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database (2000-2009) who were discharged with a functioning graft and were receiving an ISR including an antiproliferative drug and a calcineurin inhibitor as follows: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolate sodium+tacrolimus (TAC), MMF+cyclosporine A (CsA); mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi)+TAC; and mTORi+CsA. Adjusted risks of PTLD, rejection, death, and graft failure were examined in all recipients and compared between EBV+ nd EBV-recipients. Results. Of 114,025 recipients, 754 developed PTLD (5-year incidence of 0.84%). Adjusted hazard ratio for PTLD was 4.39 (95% CI: 3.60 -5.37) for EBV-versus EBV+recipients; and 1.40 (95% CI: 1.03-1.90) for mTORi+TAC, 0.80 (95% CI: 0.65-0.99) for MMF+CsA, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.57-1.42) for mTORi+CsA, versus MMF+TAC users. In EBV-recipients, hazard ratio for PTLD was 1.98 (95% CI: 1.28 - 3.07) for mTORi+TAC, 0.45 (95% CI: 0.28-0.72) for MMF+CsA, and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.39-1.80) for mTORi+CsA users versus MMF+TAC. No difference was seen in EBV+recipient groups. Rejection rates were higher among MMF+CsA recipients in both EBV groups. Death and graft failure risk were increased in all EBV+ISR groups, while in EBV-these risks were only increased in mTORi+TAC group versus MMF+TAC. Conclusions. In EBV-recipients, immunosuppression with mTORi+TAC was associated with increased risk of PTLD, death, and graft failure, while MMF+CsA use was associated with a trend to increased risk of rejection, lower PTLD risk, and similar risk for graft failure when compared with MMF+TAC.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in solid organ transplant recipients [J].
San-Juan, R. ;
Comoli, P. ;
Caillard, S. ;
Moulin, B. ;
Hirsch, H. H. ;
Meylan, P. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2014, 20 :109-118
[22]   Prevention of Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Pediatric Patients With a Liver Transplant [J].
Aliakbarian, Mohsen ;
Dehghani, Seyed Mohsen ;
Geramizadeh, Bita ;
Nikeghbalian, Saman ;
Kasiri, Karamali ;
Kazemi, Kourosh ;
Shamsaeefar, Ali ;
Bahador, Ali ;
Malekhosseini, Seyed Ali .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 13 (05) :426-429
[23]   Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in Chinese pediatric liver transplant recipients: a single-center experience and retrospective study [J].
Qin, T. ;
Xue, F. ;
Xia, Q. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (08) :247-247
[24]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in lung transplant recipients [J].
Cheng, Jesse ;
Moore, Cody A. ;
Iasella, Carlo J. ;
Glanville, Allan R. ;
Morrell, Matthew R. ;
Smith, Randall B. ;
McDyer, John F. ;
Ensor, Christopher R. .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 32 (05)
[25]   Improved Survival with Recent Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) in Children with Kidney Transplants [J].
Dharnidharka, V. R. ;
Martz, K. L. ;
Stablein, D. M. ;
Benfield, M. R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 (04) :751-758
[26]   Early post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder - Case of fatal lymphoma after kidney transplantation [J].
Lausevic, Mirjana ;
Markovic-Lipkovski, Jasmina ;
Terzic, Tatjana ;
Jovanovic, Natasa ;
Milinkovic, Marija ;
Naumovic, Radomir .
SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2016, 144 (5-6) :325-328
[27]   Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder - Incidence, presentation, and response to treatment in lung transplant recipients [J].
Reams, D ;
McAdams, HP ;
Howell, DN ;
Steele, MP ;
Davis, RD ;
Palmer, SM .
CHEST, 2003, 124 (04) :1242-1249
[28]   The Impact of Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease in High-risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: Benefits of Prevention [J].
Kiberd, Bryce A. ;
Daley, Christopher J. A. .
TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT, 2025, 11 (05) :e1792
[29]   A Case Report: Hepatic Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in a Non-Liver Transplant Patient [J].
Koyun, M. ;
Hazar, V. ;
Akkaya, B. ;
Comak, E. ;
Gokceoglu, A. U. ;
Dogan, C. S. ;
Cubuk, S. M. ;
Akman, S. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 43 (05) :2102-2106
[30]   EXPERIENCE WITH POSTTRANSPLANT LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS IN SOLID ORGAN TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS [J].
NALESNIK, MA ;
LOCKER, J ;
JAFFE, R ;
REYES, J ;
COOPER, M ;
FUNG, J ;
STARZL, TE .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 1992, 6 (03) :249-252