Trends in Regionalization of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

被引:10
|
作者
Hsia, Renee Y. [1 ,2 ]
Sabbagh, Sarah [1 ]
Sarkar, Nandita [3 ]
Sporer, Karl [1 ,4 ]
Rokos, Ivan C. [5 ]
Brown, John F. [1 ,6 ]
Brindis, Ralph G. [2 ,7 ]
Guo, Joanna
Shen, Yu-Chu [1 ,3 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Emergency Med, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Philip R Lee Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[3] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Alameda Cty Emergency Med Serv Agcy, Oakland, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Olive View Med Ctr, Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] San Francisco Emergency Med Serv Agcy, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[8] Grad Sch Business & Publ Policy, Naval Postgrad Sch, Monterey, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; SYSTEMS; OUTCOMES; REPERFUSION; DIFFERENCE; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; TRIAGE;
D O I
10.5811/westjem.2017.8.34592
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: California has led successful regionalized efforts for several time-critical medical conditions, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but no specific mandated protocols exist to define regionalization of care. We aimed to study the trends in regionalization of care for STEMI patients in the state of California and to examine the differences in patient demographic, hospital, and county trends. Methods: Using survey responses collected from all California emergency medical services (EMS) agencies, we developed four categories - no, partial, substantial, and complete regionalization - to capture prehospital and inter-hospital components of regionalization in each EMS agency's jurisdiction between 2005-2014. We linked the survey responses to 2006 California non-public hospital discharge data to study the patient distribution at baseline. Results: STEMI regionalization-of-care networks steadily developed across California. Only 14% of counties were regionalized in 2006, accounting for 42% of California's STEMI patient population, but over half of these counties, representing 86% of California's STEMI patient population, reached complete regionalization in 2014. We did not find any dramatic differences in underlying patient characteristics based on regionalization status; however, differences in hospital characteristics were relatively substantial. Conclusion: Potential barriers to achieving regionalization included competition, hospital ownership, population density, and financial challenges. Minimal differences in patient characteristics can establish that patient differences unlikely played any role in influencing earlier or later regionalization and can provide a framework for future analyses evaluating the impact of regionalization on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1010 / 1017
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reperfusion Paradox in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Armstrong, Paul W.
    Boden, William E.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (06) : 389 - 391
  • [22] Contemporary management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Yadlapati, Ajay
    Gajjar, Mark
    Schimmel, Daniel R.
    Ricciardi, Mark J.
    Flaherty, James D.
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 11 (08) : 1107 - 1113
  • [23] Prehospital Ticagrelor in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Montalescot, Gilles
    van 't Hof, Arnoud W.
    Lapostolle, Frederic
    Silvain, Johanne
    Lassen, Jens Flensted
    Bolognese, Leonardo
    Cantor, Warren J.
    Cequier, Angel
    Chettibi, Mohamed
    Goodman, Shaun G.
    Hammett, Christopher J.
    Huber, Kurt
    Janzon, Magnus
    Merkely, Bela
    Storey, Robert F.
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Stibbe, Olivier
    Ecollan, Patrick
    Heutz, Wim M. J. M.
    Swahn, Eva
    Collet, Jean-Philippe
    Willems, Frank F.
    Baradat, Caroline
    Licour, Muriel
    Tsatsaris, Anne
    Vicaut, Eric
    Hamm, Christian W.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (11) : 1016 - 1027
  • [24] ST-segment Elevation: Myocardial Infarction or Simulacrum?
    Patel, Nachiket
    Ngo, Elizabeth
    Paterick, Timothy E.
    Ammar, Khawaja Afzal
    Chandrasekaran, Krishnaswamy
    Tajik, A. Jamil
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (3-4) : 85 - 99
  • [25] Accelerated management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the ED
    Havel, Christof
    Schreiber, Wolfgang
    Christ, Guenter
    Winkler, Susanne
    Herkner, Harald
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 29 (06) : 650 - 655
  • [26] Anticoagulation for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Eikelboom, John W.
    Weitz, Jeffrey I.
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 119 (09) : 1186 - 1188
  • [27] Frequency of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment myocardial infarction, and unstable angina: results from a Southwest Chinese Registry
    Li, Si-Yi
    Zhou, Ming-Gang
    Ye, Tao
    Cheng, Lian-Chao
    Zhu, Feng
    Cui, Cai-Yan
    Zhang, Yu-Mei
    Cai, Lin
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (01) : 239 - 245
  • [28] Systems of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Impact of Different Models on Clinical Outcomes
    Danchin, Nicolas
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (10) : 901 - 908
  • [29] Prognostic Significance of Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias Complicating ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Podolecki, Tomasz
    Lenarczyk, Radoslaw
    Kowalczyk, Jacek
    Jedrzejczyk-Patej, Ewa
    Chodor, Piotr
    Mazurek, Michal
    Francuz, Pawel
    Streb, Witold
    Mitrega, Katarzyna
    Kalarus, Zbigniew
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 121 (07) : 805 - 809
  • [30] Evaluation of Door-to-Balloon Times After Implementation of a ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Network
    Evers, Julianne M.
    York, Nancy L.
    Owens, Heather
    Hardin-Pierce, Melanie G.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2022, 37 (05) : E107 - E113