共 50 条
Trends in Regionalization of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
被引:10
|作者:
Hsia, Renee Y.
[1
,2
]
Sabbagh, Sarah
[1
]
Sarkar, Nandita
[3
]
Sporer, Karl
[1
,4
]
Rokos, Ivan C.
[5
]
Brown, John F.
[1
,6
]
Brindis, Ralph G.
[2
,7
]
Guo, Joanna
Shen, Yu-Chu
[1
,3
,8
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Emergency Med, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Philip R Lee Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[3] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Alameda Cty Emergency Med Serv Agcy, Oakland, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Olive View Med Ctr, Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] San Francisco Emergency Med Serv Agcy, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[8] Grad Sch Business & Publ Policy, Naval Postgrad Sch, Monterey, CA USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;
SYSTEMS;
OUTCOMES;
REPERFUSION;
DIFFERENCE;
MANAGEMENT;
MORTALITY;
TRIAGE;
D O I:
10.5811/westjem.2017.8.34592
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Introduction: California has led successful regionalized efforts for several time-critical medical conditions, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but no specific mandated protocols exist to define regionalization of care. We aimed to study the trends in regionalization of care for STEMI patients in the state of California and to examine the differences in patient demographic, hospital, and county trends. Methods: Using survey responses collected from all California emergency medical services (EMS) agencies, we developed four categories - no, partial, substantial, and complete regionalization - to capture prehospital and inter-hospital components of regionalization in each EMS agency's jurisdiction between 2005-2014. We linked the survey responses to 2006 California non-public hospital discharge data to study the patient distribution at baseline. Results: STEMI regionalization-of-care networks steadily developed across California. Only 14% of counties were regionalized in 2006, accounting for 42% of California's STEMI patient population, but over half of these counties, representing 86% of California's STEMI patient population, reached complete regionalization in 2014. We did not find any dramatic differences in underlying patient characteristics based on regionalization status; however, differences in hospital characteristics were relatively substantial. Conclusion: Potential barriers to achieving regionalization included competition, hospital ownership, population density, and financial challenges. Minimal differences in patient characteristics can establish that patient differences unlikely played any role in influencing earlier or later regionalization and can provide a framework for future analyses evaluating the impact of regionalization on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1010 / 1017
页数:8
相关论文