The Munich Eating and Feeding Disorder Questionnaire (Munich ED-Quest) DSM-5/ICD-10: Validity, Reliability, Sensitivity to Change and Norms

被引:22
作者
Fichter, Manfred Maximilian [1 ,2 ]
Quadflieg, Norbert [1 ]
Gierk, Benjamin [3 ,4 ]
Voderholzer, Ulrich [1 ,2 ]
Heuser, Joerg [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Fac Med, Schon Klin Roseneck, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Schon Klin Hamburg Eilbek, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
eating disorders; assessment; questionnaire; diagnostic; DSM-5; ICD-10; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; DIAGNOSTIC SCALE; DSM-IV; ANOREXIA; BULIMIA; INVENTORY; ICD-10; SIAB;
D O I
10.1002/erv.2348
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe aim of the article is to report on the psychometric properties of a newly developed self-rating scale (Munich Eating and Feeding Disorder Questionnaire) for the detailed assessment of eating and feeding disorders on the basis of the DSM-5 criteria. The questionnaire aims at developing a comprehensive assessment of eating disorder symptoms suitable for severity ratings with regard to total scale and subscales, for deriving eating disorder diagnoses according to DSM-5 and ICD-10 and for measuring (intervention induced) changes over time. MethodsItems were formulated by clinical experts and entered into factor analysis in two separate samples of eating-disordered inpatients. Additionally, 47 clinical and 547 community control participants were assessed. Internal consistency and sensitivity to change over time are also reported. ResultsThree subscales were identified covering preoccupation with figure and weight', bingeing and vomiting' and inappropriate compensatory behaviour' for current and past state. Test-retest reliability for the three subscales ranged between .95 and .98 (current status). A high sensitivity to change during inpatient treatment from admission to discharge was expressed in high effect sizes; for the total score (current status) for all eating disorders, the effect size was 1.70. Effect sizes for anorexia nervosa were mostly lower than those for bulimia nervosa. Clinical and community controls obtained significantly lower scores compared with eating-disordered patients. ConclusionThis new DSM-5 questionnaire shows satisfying psychometric properties and is well suited for the rating of eating disorder severity in clinical practice and research. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 240
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PSYCH PROCEDURES PER
[2]  
[Anonymous], J PSYCHIAT RES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EDI 3 EATING DISORDE
[4]  
Association AP, 1980, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.DSM04, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.dsm04]
[5]  
Beck A. T., 1996, BECK DEPRESSION INVE, DOI 10.1037/t00742-000
[6]   The Yale-Brown-Cornell eating disorders scale self-report questionnaire: A new, efficient tool for clinicians and researchers [J].
Bellace, Dara L. ;
Tesser, Rebecca ;
Berthod, Samantha ;
Wisotzke, Kimberly ;
Crosby, Ross D. ;
Crow, Scott J. ;
Engel, Scott G. ;
Le Grange, Daniel ;
Mitchell, James E. ;
Peterson, Carol B. ;
Simonich, Heather K. ;
Wonderlich, Stephen A. ;
Halmi, Katherine A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2012, 45 (07) :856-860
[7]   Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination-questionnaire: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Berg, Kelly C. ;
Peterson, Carol B. ;
Frazier, Patricia ;
Crow, Scott J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2012, 45 (03) :428-438
[8]  
Black CMD, 1996, INT J EAT DISORDER, V20, P43, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199607)20:1<43::AID-EAT5>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-4
[10]  
Carter MJ, 2014, THER RECREAT J, V48, P275