Accuracy of Interchangeable Implant Impression Systems: An In Vitro Pilot Study

被引:1
作者
Aldosari, Abdullah M. AlFarraj [1 ,2 ]
AlBaker, Abdulaziz M. [3 ]
AlShihri, Abdulmonem A. [4 ]
AlJadeed, Majid I. [5 ]
AlBwardi, Loay A. [6 ]
Anil, Sukumaran [7 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Prosthodont & Implantol, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dent Implant & Osseointegrat Res Chair, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent Sci, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Dent Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Riyadh Mil Hosp, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[6] Minist Hlth, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[7] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Periodont & Community Dent, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
关键词
dental implant systems; impression accuracy; interchangeability; transfer coping; CLINICAL COMPLICATIONS; MARGINAL FIT; ABUTMENT; CUSTOM; STRESS; MISFIT; STOCK; CAST;
D O I
10.1097/ID.0000000000000231
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of impressions on changing the implant component (coping and abutment replica) between Branemark and BIOMET 3i and between Straumann and Allfit. Materials and Methods: Two master casts were constructed, one containing pair of Branemark self-tap Mk II fixtures (Nobel Biocare) labeled Master cast I and the other containing pair of Straumann Standard plus implant, SLA fixtures (Straumann) labeled Master cast II. Ten impressions of each master cast were made by open tray technique using polyether impression material. Five out of 10 impressions made from master cast I contained Branemark pair of coping and replica and the other 5 contained 3i (Implant Innovations). Five out of 10 impressions made from master cast II contained Straumann pair of copings and replica and the remaining 5 contained Allfit implants (Ihde Dental). Duplicated casts were prepared, and distances between copings were measured using traveling microscope and compared the distance in master casts. Result: No significant difference was observed in mean value between 2 master casts and their duplicates. Conclusion: The interchangeability of coping and abutment replica between Branemark and BIOMET 3i and between Straumann and Allfit was found to be possible without compromising the quality of impressions.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 322
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Barbosa Gustavo Augusto Seabra, 2008, Braz. Dent. J., V19, P358
[2]   Effect of Crown to Implant Ratio and Implant Dimensions on Periimplant Stress of Splinted Implant-Supported Crowns: A Finite Element Analysis [J].
Bayraktar, Mehmet ;
Gultekin, B. Alper ;
Yalcin, Serdar ;
Mijiritsky, Eitan .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2013, 22 (04) :406-413
[3]  
Binon P P, 1995, Int J Prosthodont, V8, P162
[4]  
Binon P P, 1996, Implant Dent, V5, P235, DOI 10.1097/00008505-199600540-00002
[5]  
Binon PP, 1996, INT J PROSTHODONT, V9, P511
[6]   A laboratory study of dimensional changes for three elastomeric impression materials using custom and stock trays [J].
Boulton, JL ;
Gage, JP ;
Vincent, PF ;
Basford, KE .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1996, 41 (06) :398-404
[7]  
Brunski J B, 1999, Adv Dent Res, V13, P99
[8]   Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays [J].
Burns, J ;
Palmer, R ;
Howe, L ;
Wilson, R .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (03) :250-255
[9]   The fit of cast and premachined implant abutments [J].
Byrne, D ;
Houston, F ;
Cleary, R ;
Claffey, N .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 80 (02) :184-192
[10]  
Çehreli MC, 2006, INT J PERIODONT REST, V26, P379