Large Eddy Simulation of MILD combustion using finite rate chemistry: Effect of combustion sub-grid closure

被引:37
作者
Li, Zhiyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cuoci, Alberto [4 ]
Parente, Alessandro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Aerothermomech Lab, Ecole Polytech Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, Combust & Robust Optimizat Grp BURN, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Politecn Milan, Dept Chem Mat & Chem Engn, Pizza Leonardo da Vinci, I-20133 Milan, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Adelaide JHC burner; Detailed chemistry; MILD combustion; Implicit combustion models; Partially Stirred Reactor; Subgrid combustion models; TURBULENT COMBUSTION; MECHANISMS; MODEL; HOT; OXIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.proci.2018.09.033
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this work, we present a detailed comparison between the conventional Partially Stirred Reactor (PaSR) combustion model and two implicit combustion models, named Quasi Laminar Finite Rate (QLFR) model and Laminar Finite Rate (LFR) model, respectively. Large Eddy Simulation (LES) is employed and the Adelaide Jet in Hot Co-flow (AJHC) burner is chosen as validation case. In the implicit combustion models, the filtered source term comes directly from the chemical term, without inclusion of turbulence effects. Results demonstrate that the two implicit models behave similarly to the conventional PaSR model, for the mean and root-mean-square of the temperature and species mass fractions, and that all models provide very satisfactory predictions, especially for the mean values. This justifies the use of implicit combustion models in low Damkohler number (Da <= 1.0) systems. The QLFR model allows to reduce the computational cost of about three times, compared to the LFR model. Moreover, the comparison between two 4-step global mechanisms and the KEE58 mechanism proves the importance of finite rate chemistry in MILD combustion. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.
引用
收藏
页码:4519 / 4529
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Afarin Y., 2011, 7 MED COMB S NAPL IT
[2]   Numerical Investigation of a MILD Combustion Burner: Analysis of Mixing Field, Chemical Kinetics and Turbulence-Chemistry Interaction [J].
Aminian, Javad ;
Galletti, Chiara ;
Shahhosseini, Shahrokh ;
Tognotti, Leonardo .
FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 2012, 88 (04) :597-623
[3]   Global Combustion Mechanisms for Use in CFD Modeling under Oxy-Fuel Conditions [J].
Andersen, Jimmy ;
Rasmussen, Christian Lund ;
Giselsson, Trine ;
Glarborg, Peter .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2009, 23 (3-4) :1379-1389
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, THESIS
[5]   ON REDUCED MECHANISMS FOR METHANE AIR COMBUSTION IN NONPREMIXED FLAMES [J].
BILGER, RW ;
STARNER, SH ;
KEE, RJ .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1990, 80 (02) :135-149
[6]   Mild combustion [J].
Cavaliere, A ;
de Joannon, M .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2004, 30 (04) :329-366
[7]  
Chomiak J., 1990, Combustion: A Study in Theory, Fact and Application
[8]   OpenSMOKE plus plus : An object-oriented framework for the numerical modeling of reactive systems with detailed kinetic mechanisms [J].
Cuoci, A. ;
Frassoldati, A. ;
Faravelli, T. ;
Ranzi, E. .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 192 :237-264
[9]   Structure of turbulent non-premixed jet flames in a diluted hot coflow [J].
Dally, BB ;
Karpetis, AN ;
Barlow, RS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2002, 29 :1147-1154
[10]   Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent combustion in a stagnation point reverse flow combustor using detailed chemistry [J].
Duwig, C. ;
Iudiciani, P. .
FUEL, 2014, 123 :256-273