Thermo-economic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell using human waste as a source of fuel

被引:0
作者
Afolabi, A. E. [1 ]
Sunday, K. [1 ]
Abdulkareem, A. S. [1 ,2 ]
Abdulsalam, Y. O. [1 ]
Kovo, A. S. [1 ]
Oladijo, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Technol, Sch Infrastruct Proc Engn & Technol, Chem Engn Dept, PMB 065, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria
[2] Botswana Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Chem Mat & Met Engn, Private Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana
关键词
Biogas; Bio-digester; ATR; Shift reactor; SOFC; HUMAN FECES; SYSTEM; GASIFICATION; RECOVERY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e01024
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The production of fuel cell technology for commercial purposes is hindered by limited durability and cost. Hence, we focused on the thermo-economic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) that is fuelled with hydrogen produced from human waste to generate 200 kW power. This was achieved through computer simulation using Thermolib 5.4 version (a MATLAB/Simulink's software). Two configurations were adopted for biomass production and are based on gasification and slow pyrolysis. The results obtained revealed that producer gas from gasification and slow pyrolysis have a thermal efficiency of 82.2 % and 34.69 respectively. Lower heating value (LHV) of 113.14 kJ/mole and 466.37 kJ/mole accounted for the variation. Additional energy requirements of 571.50 kW for gasification and 353.04 kW for slow pyrolysis would be needed to achieve the set power output. Exergy analysis further showed that producer gas (slow pyrolysis) had the highest exergy input of 11848.86 kW and corresponding output of 11160.91 kW which was far higher than that of producer gas (gasification) with exergy input as 5,992.17 kW, and exergy output of 5698.44 kW. The difference was due to the presence of ethane which had the highest standard exergy of 1437.2 kJ/mole in addition to the methane content of the gas. The exergy efficiency indicated that auto-thermal reformer (ATR) had an efficiency of 99.71% and 99.6% for gasification and slow pyrolysis respectively. The SOFC from producer gas gasification had an efficiency of 57.59 % with the reformate stream having a mole fraction of 0.3543 and 0.0028 for hydrogen and carbon monoxide respectively whereas producer gas from slow pyrolysis had 72.50% exergy efficiency with mole fractions of 0.5194 of hydrogen and 0.1288 of carbon monoxide in the reformate. The cost analysis indicated that the total annual cost for producer gas from slow pyrolysis configuration was $190,380.70, which is higher than that of producer gas from gasification configuration by 52.66%. Exergy and economic performance favoured the choice of gasification configuration as the preferred route to produce hydrogen gas for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell configuration. We concluded that fuelling of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell with producer gas from human waste is viable, efficient, and highly economical. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of African Institute of Mathematical Sciences / Next Einstein Initiative.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Abdulkareem A.S., 2015, P WORLD C ENG, VII, P785
[2]  
Abdulsalam Y.O, 2020, THERMO EC ANAL PEM F, P2276, DOI [10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00485, DOI 10.1016/J.SCIAF.2020.E00485]
[3]  
Abuadala G.A, 2010, CANADA, V27, P64
[4]   The thermodynamic implications of electricity end-use for heat and power [J].
Allen, Stephen R. ;
Hammond, Geoffrey P. ;
McKenna, Russell C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART A-JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 2017, 231 (06) :508-525
[5]  
Arsalis A, 2007, THESIS, P123
[6]   Activation of Protein Kinase PKR Requires Dimerization-induced cis-Phosphorylation within the Activation Loop [J].
Dey, Madhusudan ;
Mann, Brian Rick ;
Anshu, Ashish ;
Amin-ul Mannan, M. .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 289 (09) :5747-5757
[7]   Importance of exergy for analysis, improvement, design, and assessment [J].
Dincer, I. ;
Ratlamwala, T. A. H. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 2 (03) :335-349
[8]  
Dincer I., 2001, Entropy, V3, DOI 10.3390/e3030116
[9]  
Emordi C.O., 2018, IOP C SERIES, V173, P1, DOI 10/1088/1755-1315/173/1/012010
[10]   Analysis of an integrated agro-waste gasification and 120 kW SOFC CHP system: modeling and experimental investigation [J].
Galvagno, Antonio ;
Prestipino, Mauro ;
Zafarana, Giovanni ;
Chiodo, Vitaliano .
71ST CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION (ATI 2016), 2016, 101 :528-535